By combining three processes of capturing sunlight, generating oxygen and hydrogen groups of scientists are hoping to unleash abundant energy for earthlings.
Solar cells can take sunlight and produce a current, giving instant power. But as soon as the sun goes down, the lights go dim. If you could turn sunlight into fuel - to use for transportation or simply to store for later - you'd be onto a good thing.
Nature can already do this, thanks to photosynthesis. Green plants take water, sunlight and carbon dioxide to make sugars and starches. This provides all the fuel they need, and most of the fuel we need too, in the form of food or oil.
The problem is that plants aren't very efficient at fuel making - only about 3 per cent of the sun's energy ends up as useable fuel. And the fuel that works for plants doesn't necessarily work for us - the sugars and starches have to be further processed if our needs are more sophisticated than simply eating or burning.
But where plants excel is in getting electrons out of water to produce a fuel. A photovoltaic system, or solar cell, is simply a means of shifting electrons from one place to another. To make a fuel, the electrons are siphoned off, and stored in chemical bonds.
Plants get their electron supply from water. Chemists worldwide are trying to design synthetic systems that do the same. And the design they have to beat not only works at room temperature, it does so without the need for expensive metal catalysts. Making something cheap and similar to the machinery used by plants, the photosystem-II protein complex (PSII), remains a fundamental challenge.
Some US chemists taking on the challenge are part of a collaborative effort called Powering the Planet, backed by the National Science Foundation. Three basic chemistry problems, each tackled by a different research team, form the crux of the project. One is to design an affordable material to collect energy from the sun and convert it into current (led by Nate Lewis at the California Institute of Technology, or Caltech).
Another is to perfect a catalyst at one end of the material to split water and produce oxygen (led by Dan Nocera at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology). And, the third is to design another catalyst at the other end to produce hydrogen, to be used as a fuel (led by Harry Gray, also at Caltech).
"We've made dramatic advances," says Gray, who can be seen as the father of the project, having supervised both Nocera and Lewis as students in the 1980s. "We're not close to assembling the full device yet."
To start the fuel-making process, sunlight hits a photo-active material. In plants this is chlorophyll, but in the lab it can be a silicon semiconductor, which has its electrons whacked out of position by the incoming photons. The dislodged electrons start to flow in one direction, creating a current. Left behind are positive charges, known as holes, and they drift in the opposite direction. This is a basic solar cell, which requires silicon of high purity, otherwise material defects cause the electrons and holes to recombine, reducing its performance.
Plant power
In the Powering the Planet design, catalysts at either end of the semiconductor are used to drag the electrons and holes out of the system, preventing them from recombining with each other. And water is added to provide the raw material for making the fuel.
One catalyst uses the holes in the semiconductor to drag further electrons from water. This process splits water, releasing oxygen and positively charged hydrogen ions (protons). These protons flow to the other catalyst, which combines them with the electrons in the semiconductor ultimately to make hydrogen molecules.
As well as providing hydrogen fuel for combustion, both the hydrogen and oxygen gases can be fed into a fuel cell - a means of reacting hydrogen with oxygen to produce water and electricity for powering an electric vehicle.
There are other ways to split water artificially. In 1975, Nobel prize-winning physicist Jack Kilby invented an electrolysis system that used power from a solar cell to drive electric current through a water-based solution (an electrolyte). This process produced protons and hydroxide ions, which reacted at the electrodes to make hydrogen and oxygen.
Aside from Kilby's simple system, more complex electrolysis cells have been built that use a photoactive semiconductor coated on one side with a platinum catalyst as one of the electrodes. When immersed in water, the semiconductor can both harvest light and generate the electrons and holes needed to split water into protons and oxygen. Hydrogen is released directly from the surface of the semiconductor, and oxygen is produced at a second platinum electrode.
This cell was built in 1998 by John Turner from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in Golden, Colorado. His device converted water to hydrogen with 12.4 per cent efficiency, four times as good as photosynthesis. But Turner had to use expensive materials such as platinum, the system had a lifetime of just 20 hours, and the hydrogen produced cost $13 per kilogram. "We can do better," says Turner.
The problem with all electrolysis systems is that the electrode materials degrade rapidly in solution, and need to be replaced, increasing costs and decreasing efficiency. The main difference between Turner's cell and future technologies will be the materials used, with the precious-metal catalyst and expensive single-crystal silicon superseded by cheaper materials. "If we're going to solve this problem we can't use materials that are toxic or expensive," says Gray. "This rules out most standard catalysts."
Nature News
Behind the scene
Dan Nocera, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, is developing the oxygen-producing catalyst, which is proving to be the hardest part of the challenge. Nocera's team began by looking at expensive metals that are related to cheaper metals: a trick often used by chemists. Choose a target metal that could be potentially used, then look at its position in the periodic table and move down a row to a heavier, more expensive metal, where processes happen more slowly, and are more easily studied. Nocera has been using ruthenium, directly below iron. He hopes to transfer what he has learned to iron, copper or nickel, and is confident that this leap will happen soon, making a working system possible within five years, he says.
James Durrant, a chemist at Imperial College London, is also investigating water-splitting materials. He is well aware of the chemistry problems faced by Nocera in his quest for a cheaper catalyst. "Oxidising water is vicious chemistry," he says. The catalytic reactions involve molecules undergoing multi-electron processes, which are poorly understood. "As bad as it is to transfer one electron, the molecule is even more reluctant to give up the second electron," explains Atwater.
This is because adding solar energy to water, and tying it up in molecules with higher energy bonds (oxygen and hydrogen) is what's known as a thermodynamically uphill process. And most of that uphill struggle happens at the oxygen-producing site. Making a single molecule of oxygen involves splitting two water molecules, and the whole process involves four electrons and four protons. "That's a lot of electrons and protons," says Nocera. For this reason, Nocera says he doesn't want to simply copy photosynthesis. "It took 2 billion years of evolution," he says. "I don't think I can do it in 20."
Nanorods
Nate Lewis is leading Powering the Planet's light-harvesting effort. His team is refining a silicon material that he describes as "cheap and scalable." Instead of expensive single-crystal silicon, Lewis' photoelectric material is a carpet of nanoscale silicon rods, all pointing upward. He's done this work with Harry Atwater, director of the Caltech Center for Sustainable Energy Research.
The rods are each single crystals, but the method used to grow them is much simpler than the precision wafer-processing technology needed for conventional solar cells. Atwater claims that this makes the rod silicon only as expensive as the silicon feedstock, at between $40 and $70 per kilogram.
The nanorods are also amazingly defect-free.
In the device imagined by the Powering the Planet team, Lewis and Atwater's silicon-rod carpet will be held inside a plastic membrane. The catalysts are coated on opposite sides of the membrane to prevent the oxygen and hydrogen reuniting, potentially explosively.
Harry Gray is making good progress at the hydrogen-producing end of the system. His catalyst is a cobalt molecule. "It works really well, with quite reasonable efficiency," he says. This rather depends on your expectations. In catalysis, turnover rates are used to measure how many substrate molecules are converted to a product each second. Hydrogenase enzymes, which power the same reaction in plants, have turnovers of about 6,000 per second, but Gray's catalyst is still a factor of a thousand less efficient than the hydrogenase enzyme, he says. "We have a proof of principle, but we have a long way to go," says Gray.