Indians have been caught in the campaign crossfire of two leading Democratic presidential hopefuls — former first lady Hillary Clinton and rising star Barack Obama.

Obama fired the first salvo shortly after the Clinton campaign released her financial information under government ethics rules for presidential candidates with his team circulating what was purported to be an analysis of “Hillary Clinton (D-Punjab)’s Personal, Financial,  And Political Ties To India”.

This is an apparent reference to a joke that Hillary Clinton once made during a fund-raiser in a Sikh supporter’s home that she can run for a Senate seat from Punjab and win easily.

The document circulated to news organisations — on what it demanded be a not-for-attribution — referred to the Clintons’ investment in India and Hillary Clinton’s fund-raising efforts among Indian Americans.

The Clintons have reaped significant financial rewards from their relationship with the Indian community, both in their personal finances and Hillary’s campaign fundraising, it alleged.

Hillary Clinton, who is the co-chair of the Senate India Caucus, has drawn criticism from anti-offshoring groups for her vocal support of Indian business and unwillingness to protect American jobs, it said.

“Bill Clinton has invested tens of thousands of dollars in an Indian bill payment company, while Hillary Clinton has taken tens of thousands from companies that outsource jobs to India.

“Workers who have been laid off in upstate New York might not think that her recent joke that she could be elected to the Senate seat in Punjab is that funny,” the three-page memo said.

It also highlighted the acceptance by husband bill Clinton of $ 300,000 in speech fees from Cisco, a company the which the Obama campaign said “laid off American workers to hire Indian techies”.

Also under attack was the Clintons’ connection to the Indian-American hotelier Sant Singh Chatwal who has promised to raise millions for Hillary’s campaign but who is “alleged to owe the city of New York millions in back taxes”.

As a copy of the document fell into the hands of Hillary Clinton’s campaign, it promptly provided it to The New York Times as an illustration of dirty tricks by a rival who has sought to present his campaign as a “new kind of politics” above personal attacks.

Observers were surprised at Obama playing the outsourcing card as he himself is trying to court the Indian-American constituency with moves afoot to promote “South Asians for Obama” chapters across the country.

The United States India Political Action Committee (USINPAC) shot off a letter to Obama asking him to respond to allegations that his campaign has been “promoting hurtful stereotypes against the Indian American community”.