Login | Register News updated at 3:12 PM IST     RSS
Deccan Herald

Saturday 21 November 2009
Weather
Max: 0°C
Min : 0°C
In Bangalore
Partially cloudy
 PM not to stay at Blair House     PCB yet to seek IPL clearance from government     OECD lauds India's smart economic recovery     PM leaves for the US     India, China very important global players: US     11 dead, 118 trapped in China mine explosion     'India to be third largest economy by 2050'     Nuclear safety expert Krishnamoorthy passes away     Afghan aid must not fuel corruption: Gates     FIFA ban Iraq from international football     Major powers meet for Iran's nuke snub     Tata, Honeywell's David Cote to co-chair Indo-US CEO Forum    
 
Govt still coy on gay case
PTI,New Delhi:

Home Minister P Chidambaram on Friday held a meeting with Law Minister M Veerappa Moily and Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, all of whom were mandated by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to decide the Government’s stand on the issue at a time when the High Court judgment had not come.

 The government  appeared to be cautious in its approach on what to do with the controversial law relating to same gender sex with a meeting of three senior ministers deciding to take an in-depth view on the issue, notwithstanding Delhi High Court order decriminalising the provision.

Home Minister P Chidambaram on Friday held a meeting with Law Minister M Veerappa Moily and Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad, all of whom were mandated by Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to decide the Government’s stand on the issue at a time when the High Court judgment had not come.

Note on judgement

Chidambaram told reporters after the 45-minute-meeting that the judgment was discussed and it was decided that the Law Ministry would prepare a note on it after which they will look into it.

“We were asked to meet and take a view on the matter which was pending the High Court. However, when we fixed the date for today’s meeting, we did not know that the judgment will be delivered...

“...so we have taken note of the judgment...the judgment deals with only one aspect of section 377. Section 377 is left intact except one aspect. So we have asked department of Law to prepare a note based on the judgement and we will look at it and then we will decide what needs to be done,” he said.

Chidambaram parried questions whether the government would move the Supreme Court challenging the High Court order.

Moily said the three will submit their report to the Prime Minister. “We met  and analysed the judgment and will submit our report to the Prime Minister,” he said. Chidambaram and Moily are understood to be in favour of repealing the provision of the IPC, while Azad was reportedly of the opinion that the matter should be referred to Parliament. Former Home Minister Shivraj Patil and former Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss had taken divergent stand on the issue before the court.
Go to Top

 User Comments
[ Post Comments ]  
By: Ramesh
On: 03 Jul 2009 08:56 pm

There are more pressing issues that India needs to tackle and debate on rather than waste time on something insignificant such as the scrapping of Section 377 which is neither going to cause any harm or good to society.

Reply |  Report abuse


[ Post Comments ]

 
Related News
Friday release
Sugarcane prices: PM holds emergency meeting
Friday release
ZP chief loses his cool at progress review meeting
Meeting to appraise Hoysala patrolling
Videos
Defiant Shivsena blames IBN for its attack on channel
Defiant Shivsena blames IBN for its attack on channel
 
Submit your Videos along with brief captions: To the Webmaster.
 
Photo Gallery
Honeywell memento
Honeywell memento
TAKING A BOW
TAKING A BOW
View more photos
Cricket
Movie Guide
Sadu Kokila directed Devaru is about life and its many combinations and complications. The story is about how best one can make use of life to make...
Horoscope