Login | Register News updated at 9:49 AM IST     RSS
Deccan Herald

Saturday 21 November 2009
Weather
Max: 0°C
Min : 0°C
In Bangalore
Partially cloudy
 Afghan aid must not fuel corruption: Gates     FIFA ban Iraq from international football     India third largest economy by 2050: Carnegie Endowment     UP STF arrests two persons involved in visa racket     Major powers meet for Iran's nuke snub     China overtaking India in English usage: study     Mirwaiz free to travel anywhere he wants: Krishna     One year after 26/11- Kasab's lawyer wilts under harsh spotlight     8 militants killed in US drone attack in Pak tribal belt     Obama interacts with Cuban blogger, assures increased respect for human rights     Pakistan has nothing to fear from India: Manmohan     UP wooing expatriates with 'Discover your Roots' scheme     Union Commerce Ministry will not force SEZs in Goa: Kamat     PM, Advani to choose new Information Chief today     New deal for sugar cane farmers     US reopens probe into Watergate scandal     PM's state visit to showcase strong Indo-US relationship     Air Canada begins in-flight internet service     Cross border fertilisation of terrorism in Pakistan: Hillary Clinton     BBMP deploys IT for solid waste management     Shankaranand passes away    
 
Ramachandra Guha finds ten reasons that are holding India back
New Delhi, IANS:

What's holding India back? What stops India from becoming a 21st century superpower? There are ten reasons, according to author-historian, social analyst and teacher Ramachandra Guha.

Author-historian and social analyst Ramachandra Guha  Left wing extremism, “the biggest internal threat”, tops Guha's list of 10 hurdles that India has to confront.

“The ten political and social challenges that India has to deal with it are Left wing extremism, religious extremism, corrupt centre, decline of public institutions, growing gap between the rich and the poor, environment degradation, political fragmentation of the Indian electoral system, unreconciled borders, unstable neighbourhoods and apathy of the media,” Guha told a gathering of bureaucrats, diplomats, policy makers, think-tanks, foreign delegates and journalists in the capital Monday.

“India should not try to be a dominant and powerful country, but a less discontented nation,” said the Bangalore-based author of "India After Gandhi".
The social analyst listed left wing and religious extremism as the top two impediments in the country's march ahead.

“As Hindus make up 80 percent of the country's population, the threat of Hindu fundamentalism is also as real as the minority backlash. But the greatest internal security threat is perhaps Left wing extremism,” Guha said.    
              
He was addressing an analytical session on “10 Reasons Why India Cannot and Must Not Become a Superpower”, hosted by the Aspen Institute, a policy think-tank.   
Guha attributed the rise of Naxalism in India to two factors - geographical and social.
“In the last nine years, extremism has strengthened and consolidated in the hill and the forest areas of the country because it is easy to conduct guerrilla wars in the hilly terrain,” said Guha, elaborating on the geographical reason.   

The social and political factors responsible for the growth of Naxalism were “disadvantage and repression”, the historian said.

“Adivasis do not have an effective political voice, unlike the Dalits whose voices are represented in the public domain. Adivasis in the hills and the forests have lost their land and health and have been displaced by development projects,” Guha said.
He added that tribals comprised only 15-20 percent of the country's population.

“In states like Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand, the Dalits formed 25 percent of the population. While tribal votes mattered in 50-60 constituencies, Dalit votes played a part in nearly 300 constituencies. However, historically Dalits and Adivasis were equal partners in nation-building,” Guha said.              
The unrest, coupled with corruption in the centre, compounded the situation, he analysed.
“The constraints to energy, talent and initiative were rising in political parties. Jawaharlal Nehru had no desire to make the Congress a family furniture, but post 1970, the party became one,” Guha said.
The historian, who is known to be apolitical, said “he was not liked by the Congress, distrusted by the Left and detested by BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party)".
Pointing to the growing gap between the rich and the poor, Guha used the farmers' suicides across the country as an example. “Tens of thousands of farmers were killing themselves everyday. The vicious cycle of debts that they are trapped in could take generations to redeem. The agrarian distress in rural communities has become endemic,” Guha explained.
Along with this chasm between rich and poor is the problem of environmental degradation. “Irrational water pricing has led to rampant exploitation and depletion of ground water. The soil has been contaminated by chemicals and the air is polluted.”

With an apathetic media, unreconciled borders, hostile neighbours and fragmented electoral process, India is a very diverse and complex place. “It is still 80 percent nation and 50 percent democracy,” Guha signed off, quoting from his book, “India After Gandhi”.
Go to Top

 User Comments
[ Post Comments ]  
  Page: 1 2 3
By: K.Ragavan.Dubai.
On: 18 Jul 2009 02:52 am

Meaningful and thought provoking article fromVeteran Analyst and Journalist Ramachandra Guha.The ten Attributing reasons why India could not become superpoweris acceptable.All the ten reasons can be eradicated only if all the Politicians are consciousness.Wheather it will come true is the question mark.Good article. K.Ragavan.

Reply |  Report abuse


By: chandu
On: 14 Jul 2009 11:46 pm

Instead of fighting about the history that had happened so many years back which is not relevant to present day circumstances we have to concentrate collectively to reach out the common citizen civic amenities problem such as giving sanitation, water, electricity and good transportation facilities that is required the need of the hour now.All these facilities should be available through out the country without any shortage 24 x 7.India can be superpower if all the development works in the country should be tackled collectively for the common goal without any differences among the people, leaders and regions and religions.If at all we are interested in this we have to do all this collectively.All these things can not be achieved by an individual.Let us see how it will turn out to be.

Reply |  Report abuse


By: D.Bose
On: 14 Jul 2009 09:55 pm

How can he be a Historian? He has not got a degree in history. He is B.A( Hons) in Economics, followed by a PhD from IIM ( Calcutta) on the political movement of the hill people in Dehradun, where he used to live. He never wrote anything serious on history but got a lot of contacts in the media and he writes columns in all newspapers on all topics. Thus, he is a typical St.Stephens guy, anti-Hindu, anti-Socialist, anti-Indian pro-Western. This is the reason all Christian dominated news media are propagating for him. Maoist movement in early 1970s in West Bengal was created by S.S.Roy with the help of CIA ( admitted by the US Ambassador Monihan) to kill off trade union leaders and CPI, CPI(M). Similarly today Maoists attack only the CPI(M) but not a single Marwari was killed by the Maoists. The main culprit of Purulia Arms drop case was arrested but allowed to escape to Denmark, his native country. Massive amount of arms were supplied to the Maoists with the full knowledge of the Indian secret service. Ram Guha is talking the usual things. Adivasis are peaceful people; they are not involved in Maoist violence unless some people are provoking them to attack and loot the houses of CPI(M) supporters.

Reply |  Report abuse


By: bye
On: 14 Jul 2009 07:41 pm

Every body still in a great shock ,how come southerners yielded to fanaticism, fighting against this forces for 60 years. What a sad end.

Reply |  Report abuse


By: Charan Gill,Patiala
On: 14 Jul 2009 01:43 pm

Nehru and Bhagat singh were among the first leaders after Gandhi who who clearly understood the major internal enemy of the people in communal outfits.In a statement to the Press as early as in January 1934 in Allahabad, Nehru had analyzed communalism and the forces behind it. He asserted that the communal organizations exploited the name of religion, that while bravely talking of culture, they did nothing for culture, and that though claiming to be non-political, they functioned politically. He emphasized that the communal leaders knew little about economic issues facing the masses and, avoiding the real issues which may affect their own interests, they diverted peopleā€˜s attention to unreal and trivial matters. They thus strengthened the forces of reaction and of British imperialism.

Reply |  Report abuse


[ Post Comments ] Page: 1 2 3

 
Related News
Story of a transformation
Videos
Intl community vows support for Afghanistans reconstruction
Intl community vows support for Afghanistans reconstruction
 
Submit your Videos along with brief captions: To the Webmaster.
 
Photo Gallery
Honeywell memento
Honeywell memento
Fall foliage 2
Fall foliage 2
View more photos
Cricket
Movie Guide
Sadu Kokila directed Devaru is about life and its many combinations and complications. The story is about how best one can make use of life to make...
Horoscope