Press Esc to close
Thursday 23 March 2017
News updated at 3:03 AM IST

Gag on media

Sep 13, 2012
A fresh threat to the right to free speech and expression, which has been sanctified by the Constitution, has come from an unlikely place, the Supreme Court of India, which has in the past protected and promoted it as a basic entitlement of citizens. Its judgement empowering courts to ban reporting of hearings in cases where there is a perceived chance of interference in free and fair trial amounts to muzzling media freedom. It needs to be opposed like all other assaults on the functioning on the media, which are becoming frequent now. The court has propounded a ‘constitutional principle’ which would allow aggrieved parties to seek postponement of the publication of hearings if they are seen to be prejudicial to the administration of justice. But this is disguising an unfair restriction as a constitutional doctrine, creating a devious device to undermine a basic right.

The court has desisted from laying down general guidelines on reporting of cases. That is welcome. But the right to seek a postponement of reporting and giving the courts the power to grant it on a case-by case basis would amount to imposition of the restrictive idea inherent in such guidelines. The court considers it as a preventive rather than a prohibitive measure, and a neutralising technique to balance freedom of speech and fair trial and to protect the confidentiality of proceedings. But in effect many accused, especially those with resources, will become aggrieved defendants seeking a blackout of information in sensitive and important cases. Granting of their plea to hide information is not in public interest. Even if the press does not report there is a chance that the information can circulate in the cyber media.

Judicial proceedings have to be transparent so that decisions carry conviction with the people. It is a basic judicial idea that justice should not only be done but should also be seen to be done. A watchful and vigilant press is necessary for this. The media even now accepts and goes by reasonable restrictions on reporting of judicial proceedings. There are also instances of the courts conducting closed trials in rare cases. They also have the power of contempt to punish those who violate the rules of fair judicial reporting. There is no case to go beyond these and undermine important principles like the right to free speech and the right to know. The court should review its decision for the sake of basic rights and public interest.

Go to Top

Photo Gallery
Farmers from the southern state of Tamil Nadu display skulls, who they claim are the remains...

Farmers from the southern state of Tamil Nadu display skulls, who they claim are the remains...

Artists perform during Annual Mega National Festival 'One India' in Jalandhar...

Artists perform during Annual Mega National Festival 'One India' in Jalandhar...

Fire personnel dousing a major fire that broke out in the shops outside Mahakaleshwar temple...

Fire personnel dousing a major fire that broke out in the shops outside Mahakaleshwar temple...

BJP President Amit Shah greets former Karnataka chief minister SM Krishna who joined Bharatiya...

BJP President Amit Shah greets former Karnataka chief minister SM Krishna who joined Bharatiya...

Big cat beating the heat in a pond at Pilikula Nisargadhama on the outskirts of Mangaluru ...

Big cat beating the heat in a pond at Pilikula Nisargadhama on the outskirts of Mangaluru ...

An intersection Mumbai

An intersection Mumbai

So much out of much more San Francisco

So much out of much more San Francisco

Under the canopy Bengaluru

Under the canopy Bengaluru

Layers to a city Mangaluru

Layers to a city Mangaluru

Stormy sunset Singapore

Stormy sunset Singapore

Like us on Facebook

Copyright 2017, The Printers (Mysore) Private Ltd., 75, M.G Road, Post Box 5331, Bengaluru - 560001
Tel: +91 (80) 25880000 Fax No. +91 (80) 25880523