Proof of the tsunami is in the lake
Historians and scientists have long believed that Gregory and another chronicler, Marius of Avenches, who told a similar tale, were describing a tsunami that raced across the lake, devastating part of Geneva and other communities along the shore. But there has never been direct evidence of it.
Researchers at the University of Geneva now say they have found that evidence, in the form of a large deposit of sediment in the middle of the lake.In a study published in the journal Nature Geoscience, they also suggest the sequence of events that caused the deadly wave: the rockfall hit the delta at the mouth of the river, causing this pile of accumulated sediment to quickly collapse into the lake and displace a huge amount of water. “It’s a bit like dropping stones into porridge,” said an author of the study, Guy Simpson, a lecturer in the University of Geneva’s department of geology and paleontology.
Simpson said the thick lens-shaped layer of sediment, which lies more than 1,000 feet down in the deepest part of the lake, was found largely by chance. Katrina Kremer, a doctoral student and the study’s lead author, was conducting seismic soundings, searching for thin sediment layers that might be evidence of major floods.“But we came across this enormous deposit,” Simpson said. “We didn’t know straight away that it was the deposit that caused the tsunami. But it was a jumbled mess of sediment. It was quite obvious that it was deposited rapidly.”
The researchers then took cores of the sediments and used carbon-dating techniques on organic matter in the cores – remains of leaves and bits of wood – to determine when the deposit formed, narrowing the range to a period between the late fourth century and the early seventh. Other than the rockfall, there is no historical record of any special event during that period, Simpson said.
The researchers estimated that the deposit, which is at least six miles long by three miles wide and averages about 16 feet thick, contains more than 325 million cubic yards of material.They ran computer simulations that showed that the collapse of that much sediment at the mouth of the Rhone would have caused a tsunami of about 26 feet at Geneva – where it would have arrived in 70 minutes – and even higher waves elsewhere on the shoreline.
The rockfall itself may have been set off by an earthquake, as some scientists have speculated over the years. Most tsunamis occur in oceans and are generated by earthquakes, like the one off Japan last year. But lake tsunamis are not unknown, said Richard A Schweickert, an emeritus professor of geology at the University of Nevada in Reno.
He cited evidence that the collapse of part of the shoreline of Lake Tahoe within the past 20,000 years caused a tsunami with wave heights of perhaps 100 feet. There are two faults under the lake that could have caused an earthquake, he said. Schweickert said the collapse of the Rhone delta sediments, as calculated by the Swiss researchers, “would certainly be capable of moving a large amount of material into the lake.”
But the findings could perhaps be corroborated, he said, by careful mapping of the shoreline to look for unusual deposits or erosion left behind by the giant waves. Simpson said the Rhone delta sediments might collapse again someday, perhaps from an earthquake or even their own weight, and a resulting tsunami could be far more devastating.
In the sixth century, Geneva was a small community, mostly behind walls on a hill; today it is home to international organisations and about 200,000 people, many living in low-lying areas near the water.The study is a reminder that even a landlocked nation like Switzerland is not immune to catastrophic waves.“People think, ‘Oh, lucky us, we live near a lake – we don’t have any such threat,’” Simpson said.
“This reminds people that hey, hang on, these things have happened in the past, and quite likely will happen again.”