<p> The second Administrative Reforms Commission, in its report on Ethics in Governance, says while Lokayukta institutions deal with corruption in all the states, they also take up other grievances in some of them. <br /><br />Though a few states have brought functionaries like chief ministers, vice-chancellors and office-bearers of co-operatives under the purview of the institution, others have restricted its reach to a handful of functionaries. <br /><br />Aided by the probe machinery, Lokayuktas are able to conduct independent investigations in some of the states with its officials having powers to punish for contempt. <br /><br />However, the institution has been left dependent on government agencies to carry out investigations in some states. <br /><br />‘Active institution’<br /><br />The Lokayukta was set up after the recommendation made by the first ARC and Maharashtra was the first to establish it in 1972. However Lokayuktas in Maharashtra and Orissa assume the role of grievance redressal organisation, rather than functioning as investigator of corruption cases. <br /><br />The ARC report, brought out in January 2007, describes the Karnataka Lokayukta as “a very active institution” which has jurisdiction over all public servants, including the chief minister, and ministers. <br /><br />“With the Anti-Corruption Bureau forming part of the institution, it has unfettered power to inquire or investigate into cases of misconduct and deals both with allegations and grievances. <br /><br />“However, though the Karnataka Act provides for the submission of property returns to the Lokayukta by the chief minister, ministers and all legislators, few have submitted these returns so far and no action has been taken against those who have not done so”, the commission added.<br /><br />The gaps<br /><br />* There has been a noticeable lack of uniformity in the functioning and implementation of Lokayuktas<br /><br />* A few states have brought functionaries like chief ministers, vice-chancellors and office-bearers of co-operatives under the purview of the institution<br /><br />* In Maharashtra and Orissa Lokayuktas assume the role of grievance redressal, rather than being an investigator of corruption cases<br /><br />* The institution has been left dependent on government agencies to carry out investigations in some states.</p>
<p> The second Administrative Reforms Commission, in its report on Ethics in Governance, says while Lokayukta institutions deal with corruption in all the states, they also take up other grievances in some of them. <br /><br />Though a few states have brought functionaries like chief ministers, vice-chancellors and office-bearers of co-operatives under the purview of the institution, others have restricted its reach to a handful of functionaries. <br /><br />Aided by the probe machinery, Lokayuktas are able to conduct independent investigations in some of the states with its officials having powers to punish for contempt. <br /><br />However, the institution has been left dependent on government agencies to carry out investigations in some states. <br /><br />‘Active institution’<br /><br />The Lokayukta was set up after the recommendation made by the first ARC and Maharashtra was the first to establish it in 1972. However Lokayuktas in Maharashtra and Orissa assume the role of grievance redressal organisation, rather than functioning as investigator of corruption cases. <br /><br />The ARC report, brought out in January 2007, describes the Karnataka Lokayukta as “a very active institution” which has jurisdiction over all public servants, including the chief minister, and ministers. <br /><br />“With the Anti-Corruption Bureau forming part of the institution, it has unfettered power to inquire or investigate into cases of misconduct and deals both with allegations and grievances. <br /><br />“However, though the Karnataka Act provides for the submission of property returns to the Lokayukta by the chief minister, ministers and all legislators, few have submitted these returns so far and no action has been taken against those who have not done so”, the commission added.<br /><br />The gaps<br /><br />* There has been a noticeable lack of uniformity in the functioning and implementation of Lokayuktas<br /><br />* A few states have brought functionaries like chief ministers, vice-chancellors and office-bearers of co-operatives under the purview of the institution<br /><br />* In Maharashtra and Orissa Lokayuktas assume the role of grievance redressal, rather than being an investigator of corruption cases<br /><br />* The institution has been left dependent on government agencies to carry out investigations in some states.</p>
