ADVERTISEMENT
The man who sued for paternity leaveMale Feminist
The Telegraph
Last Updated IST
Josh Levs, who sued Time Warner Inc for gender discrimination, tells Jenni Frazer why employers general attitude towards fathers need to change.
Josh Levs, who sued Time Warner Inc for gender discrimination, tells Jenni Frazer why employers general attitude towards fathers need to change.

Josh Levs, who sued Time Warner Inc for gender discrimination, tells Jenni Frazer why employers’ general attitude towards fathers need to change

“From the moment I became a father,” says Josh Levs, “I tried to organise my life so I’d be home as much as possible.” Josh, 42, was a reporter for CNN, based in Atlanta, Georgia, who embraced “dadhood” in every way he knew how — including becoming CNN’s “dad columnist” on many programmes.

So, it came as a huge shock to Josh and his wife, Melanie Lasoff, when their third child, a daughter, was on the way in 2013. CNN refused to alter its policy on parental leave for fathers, which effectively extended more paternity leave to adoptive fathers than to biological parents.

Now Josh — an award-winning journalist who left CNN to write a groundbreaking book, All In — has become a fierce campaigner for the rights of fathers, and for parental leave to become national policy in America rather than something decided at the whim of individual businesses.

“Our workplaces in America were designed in the Mad Men era,” says Josh, “but actually, my generation grew up as the recipients of feminism. My teachers and family definitely taught us that we could all be anything. Girls were just as smart and capable as boys, but it seems we all lived in a bubble, believing that gender equality had taken root.”

Josh and his wife married in 2003. “We knew we wanted three children, and my girlfriend (we had this conversation before we even got engaged) knew that I wanted to stay at home and help as much as possible. We could never have known the ridiculousness of what we ran into with our third child.”

By the time their daughter was on the way, the couple already had two sons. Each child was born with “fanfare and drama”, as Josh puts it: the first had to have emergency heart surgery and the second was actually born in Josh’ arms on the floor of their bedroom, arriving too fast to get to the hospital for the birth.

“It became clear,” says Josh, “that I would be needed at home after our new baby’s birth.” With the first two children, despite the “drama”, Josh “hadn’t pushed it” when it came to extending his statutory two weeks’ parental leave.

Curious anomaly

He began to look into CNN’s policy and discovered that Time Warner, which owned CNN, had a curious anomaly: “Virtually any parent had the option of 10 weeks’ leave after the arrival of a baby. Biological mothers got this, and so did mums and dads who would care for a child who joined the family through surrogacy or adoption. But there was one exception: a man could not get those weeks for his own biological child born to the child’s biological mother.”

Josh thought this loophole must have been a mistake. “How could CNN give 10 weeks’ paid leave to everyone except a man who had impregnated his own wife? So I looked into how to challenge this protocol. I told our Human Resources Department that this must have been an oversight.” But Josh got no response, despite repeated attempts. And then, in her 35th week of pregnancy, Melanie developed acute pre-eclampsia and was rushed to the hospital. The birth was induced.

The baby was healthy, though tiny, but when she and her mother came home, Josh was eating into his meagre paternity leave, looking after his recuperating wife, two boisterous little boys aged five and eight, and a premature baby. “Eleven days after the birth, while I was holding our four-pound preemie girl, that’s when work said no, I couldn’t extend my leave.” There was no explanation.

So Josh, who had worked for CNN for 11 years at that time, appealed to the chief executive of Time Warner, the parent company. He said he would “look into this.” But nothing happened. Eventually it became clear that nothing would happen  — unless Josh made a very public challenge to CNN’s policy. He chose to do it by charging Time Warner with gender discrimination in the workplace, filing his charge through America’s Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). “I’m not giving up without a fight,” he said.

The floodgates of love

In fact, within hours of making his EEOC challenge public, a bemused Josh watched as “everything went wild. I felt that I had unleashed the floodgates of love”. American media, both traditional and social, leapt on the story — though ironically CNN itself failed to cover it. News agencies called, and Josh’s case was discussed on mainstream TV programmes.

Support poured in to Josh from both the political right and left as men and women argued that there needed to be a fairer national policy and a recognition that American workplaces were “simply not geared up or prepared for fathers to be the care-givers,” he says.

Eventually, the media storm died down and Josh had to go back to work “because I couldn’t afford not to. And my colleagues were amazing. They hugged me in the hallways and were openly and effusively supportive”. At first, Time Warner “added a third paid week that applied to dads who have kids the traditional way.”

Other fathers elsewhere in America began challenging their company policies. And then, in October 2014, just as Josh’s daughter turned one, Time Warner overhauled its entire benefits policy. Both paternity leave for natural, biological fathers, and maternity leave for biological mothers, were extended, although the restructuring has been partially at the expense of adoptive or surrogate parents, whose leave has been curtailed.

It has been “a happy ending for other families”, says Josh, although he and Melanie did not benefit directly. But now — insisting that he is very pro-business, and looking for a better way to manage the work-life balance — Josh has left CNN and with his book, All In, is making a powerful argument for a national re-thinking of attitudes to families and work.

ADVERTISEMENT
(Published 25 December 2015, 21:18 IST)