The Supreme Court of India.
Credit: PTI File Photo
New Delhi: The Supreme Court told the petitioners who challenged government's control of temples to raise their grievances first before the high courts.
Pleas were filed as early as 2012, challenging the constitutionality of various provisions of the Hindu religious endowments laws of Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Puducherry.
A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma allowed the petitioners to approach the respective high courts to assail the provisions.
Before the apex court, the Centre agreed with some state governments that petitions challenging government control of temples should first be heard by the respective high courts.
Senior advocate J Sai Deepak, on behalf of petitioners, argued that "the idea behind the filing of these petitions way back in 2009 was that the law can be laid down and the issue can be put to quietus across the board."
He urged the court to hear the petitioners in detail before arriving at any decision.
The Centre led by Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj contended that there are four legislations under challenge and in a particular state, the scheme of the act will be different. The matter will have to be first examined by the respective high courts, he said.
"Having regard to the challenge made to various provisions of the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Acts of the respective states, we find that the petitioners could be permitted to approach the respective high courts to assail the said provisions," the bench observed.
The bench said in these petitions, the provisions under challenge are not only about the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959, but also the Pondicherry Act of 1932, as well as the Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Endowments Act, 1987.
The bench opined that the better way of expressing the grievances of the petitioners is to assail the provisions of the respective laws before the respective jurisdictional high courts.
Disposing of the petitions, the bench said it will allow the high courts to better appreciate the dimensions of the challenge of the provisions of the respective laws.