<p align="justify" class="title">The Madras High Court today set aside a 2014 Income Tax department order declaring Kalanithi Maran as the principal officer of the low-cost carrier SpiceJet and making him liable for the alleged tax dues of the company when it was owned by him.</p>.<p align="justify" class="title">Justice M Duraiswamy allowed a petition by Maran challenging the November 3, 2014 order of the I-T department related to various financial years when the company was under his ownership.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The I-T department had not produced any material to establish that Maran was responsible for the day-to-day affairs of the SpiceJet, the judge said in his order.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">"The main criteria to treat a person as the Principal Officer is that he should have been involved in the management, administration and day-to-day affairs of his company," he said.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Stating that unless the I-T department make out prima facie case against Maran of his liability and obligation as principal officer of the company under section 278 B of the I-T Act, he could not be prosecuted for the offences committed by the company, he added.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">During the hearing of the petition earlier, counsel for Maran had submitted he was only the non-executive chairman and not involved in the company's day-to-day affairs.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Maran had sold SpiceJet to Ajay Singh in 2015. </p>
<p align="justify" class="title">The Madras High Court today set aside a 2014 Income Tax department order declaring Kalanithi Maran as the principal officer of the low-cost carrier SpiceJet and making him liable for the alleged tax dues of the company when it was owned by him.</p>.<p align="justify" class="title">Justice M Duraiswamy allowed a petition by Maran challenging the November 3, 2014 order of the I-T department related to various financial years when the company was under his ownership.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The I-T department had not produced any material to establish that Maran was responsible for the day-to-day affairs of the SpiceJet, the judge said in his order.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">"The main criteria to treat a person as the Principal Officer is that he should have been involved in the management, administration and day-to-day affairs of his company," he said.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Stating that unless the I-T department make out prima facie case against Maran of his liability and obligation as principal officer of the company under section 278 B of the I-T Act, he could not be prosecuted for the offences committed by the company, he added.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">During the hearing of the petition earlier, counsel for Maran had submitted he was only the non-executive chairman and not involved in the company's day-to-day affairs.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Maran had sold SpiceJet to Ajay Singh in 2015. </p>