<p>Four Indian-American groups are among a coalition of 64 organisations that have filed a complaint against Harvard University and other Ivy League schools alleging "racial-bias" against high-scoring Asian-Americans in their admission process.</p>.<p><br />The 50-page complaint, filed before the US departments of Education and Justice, alleged that "Harvard University has engaged illegally in direct discrimination against Asian- American applicants by using stereotypes and racial bias in its subjective 'Holistic Evaluation Approach' and racial quota/rebalancing."<br /><br />The complaint further alleged that Harvard University is discriminating against Asian-American applicants by using race as a major factor beyond what is allowed by relevant Supreme Court decisions.</p>.<p><br />"Consequently, Asian-American applicants have become the largest group of victims of Harvard's racially based admissions practices," they alleged.<br /><br />Among the 64 organisations of Chinese, Korean and Pakistani students, there are four Indian-American groups: National Federation of Indian American Associations, Global Organisation of People of Indian Origin-Los Angeles Chapter, BIT Sindri Alumni Association of North India, and American Society of Engineers of Indian Origin.<br /><br />The complaint urged the federal government to ask Harvard to immediately "cease and desist from using stereotypes, racial biases and other discriminatory means in evaluating Asian-American applicants during its admission process".<br /><br />The complaint also asks Harvard to disclose the qualifications of its applicant pool, at least at a level comparable to such data disclosed by elite public universities, given that Harvard, too, is the recipient of significant federal funding.<br /><br />"We believe that a racially based admission process has played a major role in Harvard and other Ivy League colleges' discrimination against Asian-American applicants," it alleged, and cited the example of Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, Pepsi CEO Indra Nooyi to illustrate that Asian-Americans have managed to rise to the top and emerge as role models.<br /><br />Many Asian-American organisations and individual students have voiced their rejection of such an unfair treatment in the past as well.<br /><br />In 2006, Jian Li, a Chinese-American student filed a complaint against Princeton University, while in 2012, an Indian-American student filed a complaint against Harvard.<br /><br />In 2013, Michael Wang, another Chinese-American student, filed a complaint against Yale and Princeton University.<br /><br />Most significantly, on November 17, 2014, Students for Fair Admissions, filed a federal lawsuit against Harvard.<br /><br />The Harvard University claims that its approach to admissions has been found to be "fully compliant with federal law" and the percentage of Asian-American students admitted to the undergraduate school has risen to 21 per cent from less than 18 per cent in the past decade. </p>
<p>Four Indian-American groups are among a coalition of 64 organisations that have filed a complaint against Harvard University and other Ivy League schools alleging "racial-bias" against high-scoring Asian-Americans in their admission process.</p>.<p><br />The 50-page complaint, filed before the US departments of Education and Justice, alleged that "Harvard University has engaged illegally in direct discrimination against Asian- American applicants by using stereotypes and racial bias in its subjective 'Holistic Evaluation Approach' and racial quota/rebalancing."<br /><br />The complaint further alleged that Harvard University is discriminating against Asian-American applicants by using race as a major factor beyond what is allowed by relevant Supreme Court decisions.</p>.<p><br />"Consequently, Asian-American applicants have become the largest group of victims of Harvard's racially based admissions practices," they alleged.<br /><br />Among the 64 organisations of Chinese, Korean and Pakistani students, there are four Indian-American groups: National Federation of Indian American Associations, Global Organisation of People of Indian Origin-Los Angeles Chapter, BIT Sindri Alumni Association of North India, and American Society of Engineers of Indian Origin.<br /><br />The complaint urged the federal government to ask Harvard to immediately "cease and desist from using stereotypes, racial biases and other discriminatory means in evaluating Asian-American applicants during its admission process".<br /><br />The complaint also asks Harvard to disclose the qualifications of its applicant pool, at least at a level comparable to such data disclosed by elite public universities, given that Harvard, too, is the recipient of significant federal funding.<br /><br />"We believe that a racially based admission process has played a major role in Harvard and other Ivy League colleges' discrimination against Asian-American applicants," it alleged, and cited the example of Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella, Pepsi CEO Indra Nooyi to illustrate that Asian-Americans have managed to rise to the top and emerge as role models.<br /><br />Many Asian-American organisations and individual students have voiced their rejection of such an unfair treatment in the past as well.<br /><br />In 2006, Jian Li, a Chinese-American student filed a complaint against Princeton University, while in 2012, an Indian-American student filed a complaint against Harvard.<br /><br />In 2013, Michael Wang, another Chinese-American student, filed a complaint against Yale and Princeton University.<br /><br />Most significantly, on November 17, 2014, Students for Fair Admissions, filed a federal lawsuit against Harvard.<br /><br />The Harvard University claims that its approach to admissions has been found to be "fully compliant with federal law" and the percentage of Asian-American students admitted to the undergraduate school has risen to 21 per cent from less than 18 per cent in the past decade. </p>