<p>A landlord is duty-bound to maintain the tenanted premises in good habitable condition, a Delhi court has said.<br /><br /></p>.<p>“Section 44 of the Delhi Rent Control Act casts a duty on the landlord to maintain the tenanted premises in good habitable condition,” said senior civil judge Anil Kumar Sisodia.<br /><br />The court made the remark during hearing of a tenant’s plea, highlighting the dilapidated condition of the premises he was residing in since 1982 and the landlord’s lack of interest in carrying out the repairs.<br /><br />North-east Delhi resident Waheed Ahmed had moved the court seeking directions to his landlord to carry out the repairs of the tenanted premises comprising a room, a restroom and a balcony.<br /><br />The court, on perusal of the photographs of the tenanted premises, noticed signs of seepage from the roof during rainy season as the landlord had broken the roof of an adjacent room. <br /><br />One of the wooden beams were damaged and had been temporarily repaired by affixing another wooden piece. <br /><br />The tenanted premises did not have any bolt or locking mechanism. The roof of the adjacent room was also broken and plastic sheet was spread over the roof of the tenanted premises to prevent water from seeping into the room.<br /><br />“The landlord has not taken any step for repairing the tenanted premises even after receiving the notice of the present petition, but has simply denied the need of repairs, which shows he is not inclined to fulfil his obligations,” the court said. <br /><br />Jailed for cheque bounce<br /><br />A man has been sentenced to six months in jail in a cheque bounce case with the court saying such offences are on “rise” and have “massive effect” on the economic condition of the victims.<br /><br />The court also imposed a fine of Rs 1,000 on convict Kundan, a Delhi resident as he failed to pay the complete amount to his debtor, despite promising to pay him the same after reaching a settlement with him.<br /><br />The court rejected the convict’s plea for leniency and for his release on probation. <br />“Such offences are on the rise and in order to keep the spirit of the legislation, the accused cannot be released on probation,” metropolitan magistrate Vishal Pahuja said.<br /><br />The court said the dispute was settled between Kundan and Fateh Chand, from whom he had taken Rs 72,000 loan but he did not pay the full amount even after this.</p>
<p>A landlord is duty-bound to maintain the tenanted premises in good habitable condition, a Delhi court has said.<br /><br /></p>.<p>“Section 44 of the Delhi Rent Control Act casts a duty on the landlord to maintain the tenanted premises in good habitable condition,” said senior civil judge Anil Kumar Sisodia.<br /><br />The court made the remark during hearing of a tenant’s plea, highlighting the dilapidated condition of the premises he was residing in since 1982 and the landlord’s lack of interest in carrying out the repairs.<br /><br />North-east Delhi resident Waheed Ahmed had moved the court seeking directions to his landlord to carry out the repairs of the tenanted premises comprising a room, a restroom and a balcony.<br /><br />The court, on perusal of the photographs of the tenanted premises, noticed signs of seepage from the roof during rainy season as the landlord had broken the roof of an adjacent room. <br /><br />One of the wooden beams were damaged and had been temporarily repaired by affixing another wooden piece. <br /><br />The tenanted premises did not have any bolt or locking mechanism. The roof of the adjacent room was also broken and plastic sheet was spread over the roof of the tenanted premises to prevent water from seeping into the room.<br /><br />“The landlord has not taken any step for repairing the tenanted premises even after receiving the notice of the present petition, but has simply denied the need of repairs, which shows he is not inclined to fulfil his obligations,” the court said. <br /><br />Jailed for cheque bounce<br /><br />A man has been sentenced to six months in jail in a cheque bounce case with the court saying such offences are on “rise” and have “massive effect” on the economic condition of the victims.<br /><br />The court also imposed a fine of Rs 1,000 on convict Kundan, a Delhi resident as he failed to pay the complete amount to his debtor, despite promising to pay him the same after reaching a settlement with him.<br /><br />The court rejected the convict’s plea for leniency and for his release on probation. <br />“Such offences are on the rise and in order to keep the spirit of the legislation, the accused cannot be released on probation,” metropolitan magistrate Vishal Pahuja said.<br /><br />The court said the dispute was settled between Kundan and Fateh Chand, from whom he had taken Rs 72,000 loan but he did not pay the full amount even after this.</p>