<p>The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) has finally cancelled the controversial Rs 670-crore tender that was called for the electrical works at the Dr Shivaram Karanth Layout. </p>.<p>According to the notification published by BDA on March 10, the tender was cancelled “due to administrative reasons”.</p>.<p>While the BDA called for the tenders on February 24, <em>DH</em>, on February 27, had reported that the BDA had floated the tender without seeking approval of the State Pre-Tender Scrutiny Committee, which came into force following “40 per cent commission” allegations in June last year.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/city/bengaluru-infrastructure/bda-flouts-procedure-calls-for-tenders-worth-rs-675-cr-1195391.html" target="_blank">BDA flouts procedure, calls for tenders worth Rs 675 cr</a></strong></p>.<p>The Committee, headed by Justice Rathnakala, had also flagged the issue to the state government and a report on the same was carried in <em>DH </em>on March 10. </p>.<p>It had also expressed concerns over such actions and said that they had derailed the purpose of the committee. </p>
<p>The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) has finally cancelled the controversial Rs 670-crore tender that was called for the electrical works at the Dr Shivaram Karanth Layout. </p>.<p>According to the notification published by BDA on March 10, the tender was cancelled “due to administrative reasons”.</p>.<p>While the BDA called for the tenders on February 24, <em>DH</em>, on February 27, had reported that the BDA had floated the tender without seeking approval of the State Pre-Tender Scrutiny Committee, which came into force following “40 per cent commission” allegations in June last year.</p>.<p><strong>Also Read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/city/bengaluru-infrastructure/bda-flouts-procedure-calls-for-tenders-worth-rs-675-cr-1195391.html" target="_blank">BDA flouts procedure, calls for tenders worth Rs 675 cr</a></strong></p>.<p>The Committee, headed by Justice Rathnakala, had also flagged the issue to the state government and a report on the same was carried in <em>DH </em>on March 10. </p>.<p>It had also expressed concerns over such actions and said that they had derailed the purpose of the committee. </p>