<p>Acting on an appeal of former RAW official Brigadier (Retd) Ujjal Dasgupta, an accused in the National Security Council Secretariat spying case, the transparency panel had earlier asked the Pune-based Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) to disclose details sought by him about the software 'Anveshak'.<br /><br />The RAW challenged the decision in the Delhi High Court which referred the matter back to the CIC saying the panel has "erred" in overlooking sections of the RTI Act which exempted security organisations like RAW from the ambit of RTI law and those dealing with third party information.<br /><br />It also directed the CIC to hear RAW, for which C-DAC was developing the software, before passing any direction on the disclosure of information about the software.Following the direction of the High Court, the CIC referred the matter to a full-bench and called RAW to present their objections regarding the disclosure of information sought by Dasgupta.<br />The snooping agency said software was developed by C-DAC on their behalf and pertained to data base management system used for storage and retrieval of sensitive data collected by the agency on such issues and which are connected with the security and defence of the country.<br /><br />"It is pertinent at this stage to highlight the fact that the 'confidentiality clause' as contracted in the contract between C-DAC and RAW was never brought to the notice of the Commission which led to the erstwhile decision directing C-DAC to furnish the information," the Commission said. </p>.<p>The bench said it is "amply established" in the "confidential contract" between CDAC and RAW that ownership of Anveshak software vests jointly with the two organisations with the "CDAC committed by contract to subserve the interest of RAW" which is an exempted organisation in transparency law.<br /><br />The case relates to RTI application filed by Dasgupta who was in Tihar Jail following allegations of passing sensitive information to an American diplomat. The former Director (Computers) RAW, Dasgupta, had contended that information about 'Anveshak' was crucial to his defence.<br /><br />The agency said any disclosure about software on its working, storage, platform, capacity etc. cannot be provided as it would result in putting sensitive information in the public domain thereby jeopardising national security as this information could well be used by India's adversaries.<br /><br />It said the averment of Dasgupta that he was kept in jail for four years in violation of his human rights does not stand as his bail applications were rejected by competent courts.<br />The Second schedule of section 24 of the RTI Act lists organisations which are not covered under the transparency law except for allegations of human rights violation and corruption. RAW is listed in the schedule and exempted from the Act. </p>
<p>Acting on an appeal of former RAW official Brigadier (Retd) Ujjal Dasgupta, an accused in the National Security Council Secretariat spying case, the transparency panel had earlier asked the Pune-based Centre for Development of Advanced Computing (C-DAC) to disclose details sought by him about the software 'Anveshak'.<br /><br />The RAW challenged the decision in the Delhi High Court which referred the matter back to the CIC saying the panel has "erred" in overlooking sections of the RTI Act which exempted security organisations like RAW from the ambit of RTI law and those dealing with third party information.<br /><br />It also directed the CIC to hear RAW, for which C-DAC was developing the software, before passing any direction on the disclosure of information about the software.Following the direction of the High Court, the CIC referred the matter to a full-bench and called RAW to present their objections regarding the disclosure of information sought by Dasgupta.<br />The snooping agency said software was developed by C-DAC on their behalf and pertained to data base management system used for storage and retrieval of sensitive data collected by the agency on such issues and which are connected with the security and defence of the country.<br /><br />"It is pertinent at this stage to highlight the fact that the 'confidentiality clause' as contracted in the contract between C-DAC and RAW was never brought to the notice of the Commission which led to the erstwhile decision directing C-DAC to furnish the information," the Commission said. </p>.<p>The bench said it is "amply established" in the "confidential contract" between CDAC and RAW that ownership of Anveshak software vests jointly with the two organisations with the "CDAC committed by contract to subserve the interest of RAW" which is an exempted organisation in transparency law.<br /><br />The case relates to RTI application filed by Dasgupta who was in Tihar Jail following allegations of passing sensitive information to an American diplomat. The former Director (Computers) RAW, Dasgupta, had contended that information about 'Anveshak' was crucial to his defence.<br /><br />The agency said any disclosure about software on its working, storage, platform, capacity etc. cannot be provided as it would result in putting sensitive information in the public domain thereby jeopardising national security as this information could well be used by India's adversaries.<br /><br />It said the averment of Dasgupta that he was kept in jail for four years in violation of his human rights does not stand as his bail applications were rejected by competent courts.<br />The Second schedule of section 24 of the RTI Act lists organisations which are not covered under the transparency law except for allegations of human rights violation and corruption. RAW is listed in the schedule and exempted from the Act. </p>