Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s state visit to the United States begins on November 24, just before Thanksgiving. Such visits include an elaborate arrival ceremony on the White House South Lawn, one-on-one time with the president and, in the evening, a state dinner. It’s a plum presidential nod of recognition for the world’s largest democracy and the most stable US ally in a hostile corner of the world.
But why India first?
It was just four years ago that President George W Bush and Singh raised their glasses and toasted the US-India relationship at the start of a July 2005 state dinner.
Indian officials, however, have watched warily since then, as the US has become more engaged with its archrival Pakistan focusing on greater military cooperation in dealing with Islamist extremists there and in neighboring Afghanistan. Honouring Singh with what is considered one of the grandest and most glamorous of White House affairs 10 months into Obama’s presidency may allay some of those concerns, along with perceptions that Pakistan has surpassed India as America’s best friend in South Asia.
It also may be Obama’s way of closing the loop with all the major US allies as his freshman year in office draws to a fast close.
Obama’s first-year international itinerary has taken him to the major European power centres of England, France, Germany, Italy and Russia. He has toured West Asia and is scheduled to visit China and possibly other Asian countries in November, before Singh’s visit.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton hand-delivered the state-visit invitation from Obama during her July trip to India.
Singh, re-elected to a second term earlier this year, and Obama met on the sidelines of a London economic summit in April, and discussed cooperating on the economic downturn, climate change and counter-terrorism. Obama later called him a “very wise and decent man”.
After years of mutual wariness during the Cold War, US-Indian relations are at a high point, thanks partly to the Bush administration’s push to allow American civilian nuclear trade with India.
The Obama administration has used that accord as a foundation for improving ties and hopes of co-operation on the president’s priority issues, such as climate change and countering terrorism.
Obama’s first one will be the talk of the town, perhaps second only to his inauguration and the parties that followed in terms of celebrity star power and got-to-be-there fever.
A tonne of planning is involved, from creating the invitation itself to compiling a guest list. Meals, desserts and wines are tasted until the right pairings are found. Flowers must be chosen and arranged just so, along with the seating, place settings and entertainment.
Responsibility for the planning falls to first lady Michelle Obama and her staff, and people will be waiting to see what twists she and her social secretary, Desiree Rogers, will put on one of the White House’s most staid traditions.
Early state dinner rumblings after Obama took office were about opening the events up to “real people”.
Inquiring minds also want to know what other changes may be in store. Will they eat in the State Dining Room or shift chairs to the larger East Room? Will dinner courses be prepared with vegetables pulled from Mrs Obama’s popular South Lawn garden?
Would they consider putting their well-dressed guests on boats headed down the Potomac River to Mount Vernon? John F Kennedy did that for his first state dinner just a few months into his term, in May 1961, for the president of Tunisia. Or how about dinner and black-tie inside a big tent in the Rose Garden? Bill Clinton did that for his first such dinner a year and a half into his presidency, in June 1994, for the Japanese emperor.
Liked the story?
0
0
0
0
0
