Predatory growth

H2 woe Water grabbing threatens Latin America's ability to conserve wetland based communities and ecosystems, writes Alejandro Camargo

Predatory growth

Latin America stands out as one of the regions where the deterioration of water resources is more dramatic than in other parts of the world. According to a recent study, this critical environmental situation is directly connected to an increase in population pressure on a global scale.

The experience of the people who face the deterioration of water resources in their everyday life, however, cannot be measured solely by population growth. For thousands of families whose livelihoods depend on aquatic resources, the deterioration of wetlands and rivers constitutes a form of water grabbing associated with the expansion of large-scale predatory economies such as mining and large-scale agriculture.

Water grabbing is the process in which powerful actors take control of bodies of water by diverting, draining, contaminating, or enclosing wetlands, rivers, and even the ocean. Contemporary development often depends on water grabbing for projects such as highway construction, large-scale dam building, monocultures, and mining.

In Argentina, the enclosure of wetlands to the expansion of agri-business has caused the deterioration of aquatic ecosystems and rural livelihoods. In 2012, the Families of Small Producers of Gallo Sapukay, in Mercedes, sent a letter to President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner denouncing the Saanto Ignacio S.A. firm, which bought and fenced large swaths of wetlands where they used to work and live.

he disputed area, and expressed fears of experiencing a similar situation to one that occurred in the nearby area of Yahaveré, where the firm Forestal Andina – which later became Hacienda San Eugenio S.A. and was involved in other environmental conflicts such as the illegal use of lands pertaining to a natural reserve – fenced a large area of wetlands and built an embankment to introduce large-scale cattle ranching in the area.

In Chile, the expansion of large-scale extractive industries that has led to the deterioration and eventual disappearance of vast swaths of wetlands has been one of the main drivers of water grabbing.

That has been the case of the Aymara community of Cancosa in Northern Chile, which has long suffered the devastating effects of the operations of BHP Billiton on their wetlands. BHP Billiton is a multinational company predominantly involved in copper mining. In Cancosa, this company has extracted copper for more than two decades and, in so doing, it has destroyed many wetlands and wells.

Consequently, the company triggered a process of dispossession in the Aymara community of Cancosa: more than 90 percent of the Aymara families were forced to leave their community because of the deterioration of water resources. As a response to this form of dispossession, the Aymara people filed two lawsuits in 2006 and 2007 against BHP Billiton demanding redress of the environmental and social damages it produced.
Revolting against tyrants
In 2012, People from Corral de Piedra, Costa Rica, lodged a complaint against Holcim – one of the world’s largest cement companies. According to this complaint, Holcim had purchased a swath of land including a very important wetland.

People from Corral de Piedra opposed the arrival of Holcim, concluding that it would pose an imminent threat to the aquatic ecosystems and the environmental sustainability of the area.

Yet the struggle against the insidious connection between the deterioration of water resources and development is not only a struggle against private companies, but also against the state, which has also been an important actor in the production of different forms of water grabbing. This is particularly clear in the intensification of water grabbing in Northern Peru, where a number of Peruvian activists and organisations have called attention to the disastrous effects of mining operations on The Virrilá Estuary, the San Pedro mangroves, and the Ramón and Ñapique lagoons in the lower Piura river basin.

The Piura river basin is the habitat of numerous species and fishing communities, but it is also becoming the home of international mining companies. Local authorities and people have suggested the creation of a community conservation area of about 54,000 hectares as a way to protect aquatic ecosystems and artisanal fishing from the effects of mining. Yet almost 82 percent of the proposed area overlaps with seventeen mining concessions granted by the Peruvian state.

For such private companies, water is nothing more than a resource that may or may not be necessary for the expansion of industry. For the fishing communities of Northern Peru, or the Aymara people of Cancosa, water is vital to their habitat, livelihoods, and socio-economic reproduction. When these two opposing visions converge, unequal power relations translate into conflicts, struggles, and environmental deterioration.

Price of ignorance
The Ramsar Convention – an intergovernmental treaty for the conservation and wise use of wetlands – globally popularised another dominant conception of wetlands. According to this convention, wetlands are ecosystems with important environmental properties for the reproduction of human and non-human species.

For a long time, wetlands were dismissed as undesirable places where diseases flourished and mosquitoes reproduced. As a consequence of this perception, wetlands were seen as obstacles to development and therefore their drainage was, to some extent, a necessity. In the name of progress, thousands of families were in this way dispossessed of their aquatic habitats.

Despite the fact that all the Latin American countries adopted the convention, the idea of wetlands as wastelands and obstacles to development seems to be more powerful. The struggle of Aymara people, fishing communities, and environmentalists is therefore a struggle against the devastating effects of that conception.

Given the growing concern about the intensification of land grabbing on a global scale mainly for the spread of large-scale agriculture, the increasing expansion of different forms of water grabbing throughout the global south calls for a more integrative approach to the problem of resource dispossession. This is so in part because land and water remain to be seen as separate worlds, but the cases of water grabbing presented here are at the same time instances of land grabbing.

This integrative approach also needs to consider the relationship between land and water beyond their material uses to include their cultural and symbolic dimensions. From this perspective, water grabbing is not only a problem of material and economic dispossession, but also a question of cultural disruption.

Narendra Modi or Rahul Gandhi? Who will win the battle royale of the Lok Sabha Elections 2019

Get real-time news updates, views and analysis on Lok Sabha Elections 2019 on 

Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter and Instagram with #DHPoliticalTheatre for live updates on the Indian general elections 2019.

Liked the story?

  • 0

  • 0

  • 0

  • 0

  • 0