<p class="title">With Australia's same-sex marriage poll widely expected to return a 'yes' majority this week, conservatives pushed Monday for protections for parents, school teachers and businesses which continue to defend a "traditional understanding of marriage".</p>.<p class="bodytext">The government has pledged to hold a parliamentary vote to legalise gay marriage before the end of the year should the nationwide survey -- held after more than a decade of political wrangling -- return a "yes" when results are announced on Wednesday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But divisions within the conservative governing coalition over how to protect the rights of people who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds threatens to derail that timeline.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A draft bill that was drawn up by Liberal Senator Dean Smith to legalise gay marriage contained exemptions that allow religious organisations to refuse to conduct same-sex marriages. That bill received bipartisan support.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But on Monday another Liberal party senator, James Paterson, unveiled a rival bill that would protect not only religious entities but also parents, school teachers, charities and businesses who oppose gay unions.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"If it is wrong to force a priest to participate in a same-sex wedding against their beliefs, it should be wrong to force a florist or a photographer too," he wrote in The Australian newspaper.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Paterson supports same-sex marriage and describes himself as a religious "agnostic", but insisted the "values" of gay marriage opponents need to be respected.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He said his bill would also allow parents to have their children "opt out of classes that conflict with their values".</p>.<p class="bodytext">"This upholds the right of parents to control the moral and religious education of their children," he added.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Paterson said would try to reconcile his bill with that put forward by Smith.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But the opposition Labor Party, which backed Smith's bill, denounced Paterson's proposal as a "delaying tactic from the opponents to marriage equality".</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Are we really saying, in Australia today, that you can refuse to serve someone because they're gay? Can you refuse to bake them a cake or drive them in your car? Honestly, that is a bridge too far," said Tanya Plibersek, the deputy Labor chief.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Equality advocates also slammed the Paterson bill as aimed at curtailing Australia's discrimination laws.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Australians are voting to make our country a fairer and more equal place, not to take us back to a time where people can be denied service at a shop," Anna Brown of the Equality Campaign said in a statement.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Turnout for the controversial survey reached almost 80 percent when voting closed last week, with polls indicating a 'yes' vote is imminent.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The conservative government chose an unusual approach for the poll -- a voluntary and non-binding postal vote -- after an election promise of a national plebiscite was twice rejected by parliament's upper house, the Senate.</p>
<p class="title">With Australia's same-sex marriage poll widely expected to return a 'yes' majority this week, conservatives pushed Monday for protections for parents, school teachers and businesses which continue to defend a "traditional understanding of marriage".</p>.<p class="bodytext">The government has pledged to hold a parliamentary vote to legalise gay marriage before the end of the year should the nationwide survey -- held after more than a decade of political wrangling -- return a "yes" when results are announced on Wednesday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But divisions within the conservative governing coalition over how to protect the rights of people who oppose same-sex marriage on religious grounds threatens to derail that timeline.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A draft bill that was drawn up by Liberal Senator Dean Smith to legalise gay marriage contained exemptions that allow religious organisations to refuse to conduct same-sex marriages. That bill received bipartisan support.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But on Monday another Liberal party senator, James Paterson, unveiled a rival bill that would protect not only religious entities but also parents, school teachers, charities and businesses who oppose gay unions.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"If it is wrong to force a priest to participate in a same-sex wedding against their beliefs, it should be wrong to force a florist or a photographer too," he wrote in The Australian newspaper.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Paterson supports same-sex marriage and describes himself as a religious "agnostic", but insisted the "values" of gay marriage opponents need to be respected.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He said his bill would also allow parents to have their children "opt out of classes that conflict with their values".</p>.<p class="bodytext">"This upholds the right of parents to control the moral and religious education of their children," he added.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Paterson said would try to reconcile his bill with that put forward by Smith.</p>.<p class="bodytext">But the opposition Labor Party, which backed Smith's bill, denounced Paterson's proposal as a "delaying tactic from the opponents to marriage equality".</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Are we really saying, in Australia today, that you can refuse to serve someone because they're gay? Can you refuse to bake them a cake or drive them in your car? Honestly, that is a bridge too far," said Tanya Plibersek, the deputy Labor chief.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Equality advocates also slammed the Paterson bill as aimed at curtailing Australia's discrimination laws.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Australians are voting to make our country a fairer and more equal place, not to take us back to a time where people can be denied service at a shop," Anna Brown of the Equality Campaign said in a statement.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Turnout for the controversial survey reached almost 80 percent when voting closed last week, with polls indicating a 'yes' vote is imminent.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The conservative government chose an unusual approach for the poll -- a voluntary and non-binding postal vote -- after an election promise of a national plebiscite was twice rejected by parliament's upper house, the Senate.</p>