<p align="justify" class="title">Trying to shed those extra kilos? Chewing slowly and refraining from eating for two hours before bedtime may help, scientists say.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Changes in eating habits were strongly associated with lower obesity and weight (BMI), and smaller waist circumference, according to researchers from Kyushu University in Japan.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The findings are based on health insurance data for nearly 60,000 people with diabetes in Japan who submitted claims and had regular health check-ups between 2008 and 2013.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The data included information on the dates of consultations and treatments, while the check-ups included measurements of weight (BMI) and waist circumference, and the results of tests for blood chemistry, urine, and liver function.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">During the check-ups, participants were quizzed about their lifestyle, including their eating and sleep habits as well as alcohol and tobacco use.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">They were specifically asked about their eating speed, which was categorised as fast, normal, or slow.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">They were asked whether they did any of the following three or more times a week: eat dinner within 2 hours of going to sleep; snack after dinner; and skip breakfast.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">More than a third (36.5 per cent) of participants had one check-up over the six years, while just under a third (29.5 per cent) had two. One in five (20 per cent) had three.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">At the start of the study, some 22,070 people routinely wolfed down their food; 33,455 ate at a normal speed; and 4,192 lingered over every mouthful.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The slow eaters tended to be healthier and to have a healthier lifestyle than either the fast or normal speed eaters.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Around half of the total sample changed their eating speed over the course of the six years.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">All the aspects of eating and sleeping habits studied, as well as alcohol consumption and previous obesity--defined as a BMI of 25 kilogrammes per square metres were significantly associated with obesity.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">After taking account of potentially influential factors, the results showed that compared with those who tended to gobble up their food, those who ate at a normal speed were 29 percent less likely to be obese, rising to 42 percent for those who ate slowly.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Although absolute reductions in waist circumference - an indicator of a potentially harmful midriff bulge - were small, they were greater among the slow and normal speed eaters.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Snacking after dinner and eating within two hours of going to sleep three or more times a week were also strongly linked to changes in BMI. However, skipping breakfast was not.</p>
<p align="justify" class="title">Trying to shed those extra kilos? Chewing slowly and refraining from eating for two hours before bedtime may help, scientists say.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Changes in eating habits were strongly associated with lower obesity and weight (BMI), and smaller waist circumference, according to researchers from Kyushu University in Japan.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The findings are based on health insurance data for nearly 60,000 people with diabetes in Japan who submitted claims and had regular health check-ups between 2008 and 2013.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The data included information on the dates of consultations and treatments, while the check-ups included measurements of weight (BMI) and waist circumference, and the results of tests for blood chemistry, urine, and liver function.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">During the check-ups, participants were quizzed about their lifestyle, including their eating and sleep habits as well as alcohol and tobacco use.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">They were specifically asked about their eating speed, which was categorised as fast, normal, or slow.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">They were asked whether they did any of the following three or more times a week: eat dinner within 2 hours of going to sleep; snack after dinner; and skip breakfast.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">More than a third (36.5 per cent) of participants had one check-up over the six years, while just under a third (29.5 per cent) had two. One in five (20 per cent) had three.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">At the start of the study, some 22,070 people routinely wolfed down their food; 33,455 ate at a normal speed; and 4,192 lingered over every mouthful.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">The slow eaters tended to be healthier and to have a healthier lifestyle than either the fast or normal speed eaters.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Around half of the total sample changed their eating speed over the course of the six years.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">All the aspects of eating and sleeping habits studied, as well as alcohol consumption and previous obesity--defined as a BMI of 25 kilogrammes per square metres were significantly associated with obesity.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">After taking account of potentially influential factors, the results showed that compared with those who tended to gobble up their food, those who ate at a normal speed were 29 percent less likely to be obese, rising to 42 percent for those who ate slowly.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Although absolute reductions in waist circumference - an indicator of a potentially harmful midriff bulge - were small, they were greater among the slow and normal speed eaters.</p>.<p align="justify" class="bodytext">Snacking after dinner and eating within two hours of going to sleep three or more times a week were also strongly linked to changes in BMI. However, skipping breakfast was not.</p>