Plea on GIM dismissed

The petitioner G R Mohan, a City based advocate and the party in person in his interlocutory application had cited a contempt petition where the State had submitted that it is unable to supply adequate power as directed by the High Court. He submitted that the power crisis will further worsen if the investment comes and sought to restrain the State from going ahead with the meet.

K M Natraj, Additional Advocate General submitted that the meet is aimed at investment in the electricity sector too and assured that once these investments comes in the power situation will be resolved. The division bench comprising Justice V G Sabhahit and Justice A S Bopanna dismissed the petition.

DH Newsletter Privacy Policy Get top news in your inbox daily
Comments (+)