<p class="title">Abrogation of special status to Jammu and Kashmir is a step towards ensuring its development and correction of a historical blunder, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi said in Lok Sabha on Tuesday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Participating in the debate on a motion to abrogate provisions of Article 370 and a bill to split J-K into two Union Territories, he attacked the Congress alleging it was speaking the same language as Pakistan.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We want to correct the historical blunder by this," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He asked Congress to support the bill and help correct the mistake made by "their ancestors".</p>.<p class="bodytext">Joshi said that the issue is not about land (bhumi-matr) but about mother-land (matra-bhumi).</p>.<p class="bodytext">The minister said that it was very unfortunate that the Congress was not supporting the decisions and divided voices were coming from the party.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Congress is not able to elect its president as there is no democracy in the party, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Pakistan is saying that it is a dark day for democracy and Congress to is saying the same, Joshi said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Recalling history, Joshi said that despite strong opposition from B R Ambedkar on Article 370, Jawaharlal Nehru went ahead with it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Nehru had stated that the Article would be corroded and eroded, but instead, the Congress was corroded in the last 70 years, and the Article was still there, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Because of your (Congress) stand and vote bank politics, your number is declining since 1984," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Joshi said that Manish Tewari (Cong) termed this move as a tragedy, but in fact the decision to take the issue to the UN was a tragedy.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Pinaki Mishra (BJD) asked the government to conduct elections in Jammu and Kashmir as early as possible.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He added that within the country, there should be one voice otheriwse people outside the country would take advantage.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Nama Nageswar Rao (TRS) said too that the bill was introduced to correct a historical blunder.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He said the second step now for the government is to change "Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) to Indian Kashmir (IK)".</p>.<p class="bodytext">He added that if they would not support the bill, people would not spare them and would call them anti-national.</p>.<p class="bodytext">This is a not a black day but a day for development of the state, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Akhilesh Yadav (SP) said that nobody knows whether the move is for the happiness of the people of the state or not.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He asked when the people of state like Nagaland, Sikkim and Mizoram "would get this happiness".</p>.<p class="bodytext">Yadav alleged that the government wanted to "confuse the country".</p>
<p class="title">Abrogation of special status to Jammu and Kashmir is a step towards ensuring its development and correction of a historical blunder, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pralhad Joshi said in Lok Sabha on Tuesday.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Participating in the debate on a motion to abrogate provisions of Article 370 and a bill to split J-K into two Union Territories, he attacked the Congress alleging it was speaking the same language as Pakistan.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We want to correct the historical blunder by this," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He asked Congress to support the bill and help correct the mistake made by "their ancestors".</p>.<p class="bodytext">Joshi said that the issue is not about land (bhumi-matr) but about mother-land (matra-bhumi).</p>.<p class="bodytext">The minister said that it was very unfortunate that the Congress was not supporting the decisions and divided voices were coming from the party.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Congress is not able to elect its president as there is no democracy in the party, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Pakistan is saying that it is a dark day for democracy and Congress to is saying the same, Joshi said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Recalling history, Joshi said that despite strong opposition from B R Ambedkar on Article 370, Jawaharlal Nehru went ahead with it.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Nehru had stated that the Article would be corroded and eroded, but instead, the Congress was corroded in the last 70 years, and the Article was still there, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Because of your (Congress) stand and vote bank politics, your number is declining since 1984," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Joshi said that Manish Tewari (Cong) termed this move as a tragedy, but in fact the decision to take the issue to the UN was a tragedy.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Pinaki Mishra (BJD) asked the government to conduct elections in Jammu and Kashmir as early as possible.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He added that within the country, there should be one voice otheriwse people outside the country would take advantage.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Nama Nageswar Rao (TRS) said too that the bill was introduced to correct a historical blunder.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He said the second step now for the government is to change "Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) to Indian Kashmir (IK)".</p>.<p class="bodytext">He added that if they would not support the bill, people would not spare them and would call them anti-national.</p>.<p class="bodytext">This is a not a black day but a day for development of the state, he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Akhilesh Yadav (SP) said that nobody knows whether the move is for the happiness of the people of the state or not.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He asked when the people of state like Nagaland, Sikkim and Mizoram "would get this happiness".</p>.<p class="bodytext">Yadav alleged that the government wanted to "confuse the country".</p>