<p>The second hearing of a complaint against a restaurant in Goa, which Congress claimed was linked to Union minister Smriti Irani's daughter, will be held before the state Excise Commissioner here on Monday.</p>.<p>The first hearing was held on July 29 by Excise Commissioner Narayan Gad, who had issued a notice to the “Silly Souls Café and Bar” restaurant located at Assagao in North Goa. Social activist Aires Rodrigues filed a complaint on June 29 alleging that the Excise office in Mapusa illegally renewed the excise licence of the restaurant in the name of a deceased person- Anthony DGama.</p>.<p><strong>Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/drop-lying-smriti-irani-from-cabinet-ex-goa-cong-chief-to-pm-modi-1132833.html">Drop 'lying' Smriti Irani from cabinet: Ex-Goa Cong chief to PM Modi</a></strong></p>.<p>The complaint stated that DGama died on May 17, 2021, and cited a death certificate issued by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. During the first hearing of the complaint held on July 29, the Excise Commissioner framed two issues for determination- whether the excise licence was obtained by Anthony DGama by submitting false, inadequate documents and by misrepresenting facts and whether there were procedural irregularities by Excise officials.</p>.<p>The DGama family was directed to file their response in this regard. According to the complainant, though Excise rules allow a bar licence to be issued only to a restaurant having a licence, the Excise department on February 18, 2021, issued the licence without the required restaurant license being in place in contravention of norms. It stated that the licence was issued in the name of Anthony DGama despite he being a resident of Mumbai and that the Aadhaar card was issued only on December 30, 2020, days before the application for the excise licence was filed.</p>.<p>The activist had also alleged that the mandatory police verification was also not done. Anthony DGama's family advocate Benny Nazareth had cited provisions in the Portuguese Civil Code, which he said mandated that when a spouse dies, his or her powers - in this case the liquor license --get transferred automatically to the partner. During the first hearing in the case, the family members of DGama had told authorities that it is entirely their business and no other person is involved in it. Irani had filed a civil defamation suit against three Congress leaders for linking her daughter's name to the restaurant.</p>.<p>The Delhi High Court had observed that Irani and her daughter are neither owners of the restaurant in Goa nor have they ever applied for the licence for food and beverages at the eatery, as alleged.</p>
<p>The second hearing of a complaint against a restaurant in Goa, which Congress claimed was linked to Union minister Smriti Irani's daughter, will be held before the state Excise Commissioner here on Monday.</p>.<p>The first hearing was held on July 29 by Excise Commissioner Narayan Gad, who had issued a notice to the “Silly Souls Café and Bar” restaurant located at Assagao in North Goa. Social activist Aires Rodrigues filed a complaint on June 29 alleging that the Excise office in Mapusa illegally renewed the excise licence of the restaurant in the name of a deceased person- Anthony DGama.</p>.<p><strong>Read | <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/national-politics/drop-lying-smriti-irani-from-cabinet-ex-goa-cong-chief-to-pm-modi-1132833.html">Drop 'lying' Smriti Irani from cabinet: Ex-Goa Cong chief to PM Modi</a></strong></p>.<p>The complaint stated that DGama died on May 17, 2021, and cited a death certificate issued by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation. During the first hearing of the complaint held on July 29, the Excise Commissioner framed two issues for determination- whether the excise licence was obtained by Anthony DGama by submitting false, inadequate documents and by misrepresenting facts and whether there were procedural irregularities by Excise officials.</p>.<p>The DGama family was directed to file their response in this regard. According to the complainant, though Excise rules allow a bar licence to be issued only to a restaurant having a licence, the Excise department on February 18, 2021, issued the licence without the required restaurant license being in place in contravention of norms. It stated that the licence was issued in the name of Anthony DGama despite he being a resident of Mumbai and that the Aadhaar card was issued only on December 30, 2020, days before the application for the excise licence was filed.</p>.<p>The activist had also alleged that the mandatory police verification was also not done. Anthony DGama's family advocate Benny Nazareth had cited provisions in the Portuguese Civil Code, which he said mandated that when a spouse dies, his or her powers - in this case the liquor license --get transferred automatically to the partner. During the first hearing in the case, the family members of DGama had told authorities that it is entirely their business and no other person is involved in it. Irani had filed a civil defamation suit against three Congress leaders for linking her daughter's name to the restaurant.</p>.<p>The Delhi High Court had observed that Irani and her daughter are neither owners of the restaurant in Goa nor have they ever applied for the licence for food and beverages at the eatery, as alleged.</p>