<p class="title">The Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging provisions of an ordinance that makes the practice of instant triple talaq a punishable offence.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Former municipal councillor Masood Ansari, city-based NGO 'Rising Voice Foundation' and advocate Devendra Mishra had filed the petition last week.</p>.<p class="bodytext">President Ram Nath Kovind had last month signed the ordinance, according to which giving instant triple talaq has been made illegal and void, and will attract a jail term of three years for the husband.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeking to allay fears that the law could be misused, the government also included some safeguards in it, such as providing for bail to the accused husband.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A division bench of Justices B R Gavai and A M Dhavale said Monday that it was not inclined to entertain the petition as a similar plea was pending before the Supreme Court.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The petition claimed that the provisions of the ordinance are "illegal, null, void, unreasonable and arbitrary".</p>.<p class="bodytext">It had sought an interim stay on those sections of the ordinance which criminalise the act of pronouncing talaq by a Muslim husband.</p>.<p class="bodytext">As per the proposed law, it would only be applicable on instant triple talaq or 'talaq-e-biddat' and would give power to the victim to approach a magistrate seeking "subsistence allowance" for herself and minor children.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A woman can also seek the custody of her minor children from the magistrate who will take a final call on the issue.</p>
<p class="title">The Bombay High Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging provisions of an ordinance that makes the practice of instant triple talaq a punishable offence.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Former municipal councillor Masood Ansari, city-based NGO 'Rising Voice Foundation' and advocate Devendra Mishra had filed the petition last week.</p>.<p class="bodytext">President Ram Nath Kovind had last month signed the ordinance, according to which giving instant triple talaq has been made illegal and void, and will attract a jail term of three years for the husband.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Seeking to allay fears that the law could be misused, the government also included some safeguards in it, such as providing for bail to the accused husband.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A division bench of Justices B R Gavai and A M Dhavale said Monday that it was not inclined to entertain the petition as a similar plea was pending before the Supreme Court.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The petition claimed that the provisions of the ordinance are "illegal, null, void, unreasonable and arbitrary".</p>.<p class="bodytext">It had sought an interim stay on those sections of the ordinance which criminalise the act of pronouncing talaq by a Muslim husband.</p>.<p class="bodytext">As per the proposed law, it would only be applicable on instant triple talaq or 'talaq-e-biddat' and would give power to the victim to approach a magistrate seeking "subsistence allowance" for herself and minor children.</p>.<p class="bodytext">A woman can also seek the custody of her minor children from the magistrate who will take a final call on the issue.</p>