Delhi cops vs Himachal cops: Kidnap case, late-night drama after Youth Congress activists' arrest over AI Summit protest

Shimla police registered a kidnapping case against Delhi police personnel; the police teams accused each another of obstructing investigation

A high-voltage standoff between the police teams of Delhi and Shimla, came to an end after a dramatic 24 hours on Thursday morning, after the Delhi police team was finally cleared to head back to the national capital along with the three Youth Congress activists arrested in connection with the "shirtless protest" at the AI Summit.

In the 24-hour stalemate, the Delhi police team was "detained" for about five hours even after procuring the transit remand from the ACJM.

On Wednesday evening, the Himachal Pradesh police registered a kidnapping case against the Delhi police personnel and "detained" their vehicles at the Shogi border near Shimla. This occurred while they were en route to the national capital with the three Youth Congress members in custody.

The three accused, along with members of the Delhi police, were taken to the residence of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (ACJM II) Ekansh Kapil at 1.30 am after undergoing medical examinations at the Deendyal Upadhyay Zonal Hospital in Shimla late Wednesday night. They were granted the transit remand, and they resumed their journey.

However, early Thursday morning, the Delhi police team was detained again at Kanlog in Shimla city. They were instructed to return to the national capital with the accused and a few additional police personnel, while the remaining members were asked to stay behind and cooperate with the investigation into the kidnapping case against them.

The Shimla police also asked the Delhi team to hand over a copy of the digital evidence they possessed, which had allegedly been gathered during the arrest of the activists in Rohru.

The Delhi police insisted that the safety of the three accused was their responsibility and that they would not leave any of their members behind. They later continued their movement towards Shoghi.

Later at the Shoghi border, however, the Delhi team was detained yet again by the Shimla police at 4 am.

The Shimla police barricaded a vehicle belonging to the Delhi police, which contained CCTV camera footage and other evidence. The Delhi police stated that this vehicle holds digital evidence, accompanying documents, and arms.

During the standoff, the Shimla police sought the keys to the barricaded vehicle, but the Delhi police refused to hand them over.

A personnel from the Delhi team informed the Shimla police that a seizure memo had been provided, and the relevant documents had been shown to the ACJM, based on which they were granted the transit remand.

The Delhi police stated that they received 18 hours of transit remand, of which five hours had already elapsed.

The impasse ended when the Delhi police shared a copy of the seizure memo with the Shimla police. Although they did not share the digital evidence, the memo listed the evidence in their possession related to the case.

Delhi Police ACP Rahul Vikram later told the media that the Shimla police could not legally seize the digital evidence or their vehicle. He added that the Shimla police would need to submit a written request if they wanted access to the evidence.

Following the departure of the Delhi team, the Shimla police dispersed from the Shogi border.

The Delhi police are now set to produce the accused before a local magistrate in the national capital to seek their remand.

'Arrest illegal'

On Wednesday, advocate for the accused, Sandeep Dutta, told the media that the arrest was illegal because the proper procedures were not followed. He opposed the transit remand on the grounds of illegal detention and the lack of proper documentation.

Advocate Nand Lal, representing the Delhi police, stated that the transit remand application was presented and approved.

The conflict began on Wednesday morning when members of the Delhi police arrested the three Youth Congress activists, Saurabh, Siddharth and Arbaz, linked to the February 20 protest at the AI Impact Summit, from a hotel in the Chirgaon area of Rohru subdivision in Shimla district. They were intercepted by local police and brought back to Shimla.

Three police vehicles ferrying the accused, who are allegedly not residents of the State, were intercepted in Shimla and Solan district and subsequently produced before a local court.

On Wednesday evening, when the Delhi police attempted once more to transport the accused to New Delhi, they were stopped again at the Shoghi border, approximately 15 km from Shimla. This situation created inconvenience for commuters due to the standoff between the two police teams.

"A case has been registered against 15-20 unknown people in plain clothes for forcibly taking three people staying in a resort in Rohru. They also took the CCTV installed in the resort with them and did not give any receipt," the Shimla police said in a statement, according to PTI.

While the Delhi police asserted that they had obtained the necessary transit remand, the Himachal police claimed that no documentation was presented and deemed the operation illegal, alleging a procedural lapse in not notifying the local police before making an arrest.

Both the Shimla and Delhi police accused each another of obstructing the investigation.

In a purported video that appeared from the Shogi border in the suburbs of Shimla city, the Delhi police officers were heard saying that they had arrested three people in the morning in connection with an FIR registered on February 20.

"We have to produce the accused arrested at 5 am today in the court in 24 hours, and you have stopped us after registering an FIR at 8 pm," a Delhi police officer could be heard saying.

However, the Shimla police maintained that a case of abduction had been filed, alleging that the Delhi Police was hampering their investigation. "I asked you for legal documentation in the morning, but you neither showed any document nor provided the FIR number," a Shimla police officer could be heard replying.

(With PTI inputs)