<p>The BJP will not deploy leaders from outside Uttar Pradesh (UP) for campaigning in the state as it did in Bihar and Delhi Assembly elections. <br /><br /></p>.<p>A decision has been taken to push local leaders or if need be, outsiders with roots in UP for election duties, said a source in the party. The BJP’s earlier electoral strategy of carpet bombing outside leaders for micro-management did not go down well in Delhi and Bihar as the party’s local leadership and cadres had interpreted the move as a reflection of distrust on their ability to deliver. <br /><br />In both the states, which the BJP lost badly, the central leadership had deployed Union ministers and non-native cadres in each of the Assembly constituencies to strengthen the local party network, which it felt was weaker than that of the opponents.<br /><br />In fact, in Bihar, the BJP had devised a much more structured and overarching management construct by dividing the party into different sectors and brought in senior leaders from the party and the RSS to work as a bridge between the grassroot workers and the election in-charge to counter the JD(U)-led coalition.<br /><br />Among the many lessons learnt from the Bihar debacle is to make election management less centralised so that the outcome, if not favourable, is not a reflection on the top leadership, said a BJP leader.<br /><br />The party, however, has some advantage as it has many heavyweights from the state – Union ministers Rajnath Singh, Kalraj Mishra, Manoj Sinha, Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, Sanjeev Baliyan and Mahesh Sharma. <br /></p>
<p>The BJP will not deploy leaders from outside Uttar Pradesh (UP) for campaigning in the state as it did in Bihar and Delhi Assembly elections. <br /><br /></p>.<p>A decision has been taken to push local leaders or if need be, outsiders with roots in UP for election duties, said a source in the party. The BJP’s earlier electoral strategy of carpet bombing outside leaders for micro-management did not go down well in Delhi and Bihar as the party’s local leadership and cadres had interpreted the move as a reflection of distrust on their ability to deliver. <br /><br />In both the states, which the BJP lost badly, the central leadership had deployed Union ministers and non-native cadres in each of the Assembly constituencies to strengthen the local party network, which it felt was weaker than that of the opponents.<br /><br />In fact, in Bihar, the BJP had devised a much more structured and overarching management construct by dividing the party into different sectors and brought in senior leaders from the party and the RSS to work as a bridge between the grassroot workers and the election in-charge to counter the JD(U)-led coalition.<br /><br />Among the many lessons learnt from the Bihar debacle is to make election management less centralised so that the outcome, if not favourable, is not a reflection on the top leadership, said a BJP leader.<br /><br />The party, however, has some advantage as it has many heavyweights from the state – Union ministers Rajnath Singh, Kalraj Mishra, Manoj Sinha, Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti, Sanjeev Baliyan and Mahesh Sharma. <br /></p>