<p>The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre to explain the reasons behind fixing Rs 8 annual income as a criterion for declaring the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) category for claiming reservation in All India Quota seats in NEET examinations. </p>.<p>"What exercise did you undertake for reaching Rs eight lakh figure or did you just list what was applicable to OBC," a bench presided over by Justice D Y Chandrachud asked Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj.</p>.<p>The bench said the income criterion cannot be uniformly applied across the country as a person living in big metropolitan cities like Mumbai and Bengaluru with the same annual earning can't be compared with those living in a remote village in Uttar Pradesh.</p>.<p>The top court put the questions while hearing a batch of petitions by Neil Aurelio Nunes and others challenging the Centre's notification of July 29 to implement OBC, EWS quota in NEET-All India Quota from the current academic session in Post Graduate courses in medical colleges across the country. </p>.<p>As many as 15% seats in MBBS and 50% seats in MS and MD courses in medical colleges are filled through all India quota from the candidates selected on the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test.</p>.<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/think-over-and-fall-in-line-to-restore-old-neet-ss-pattern-sc-tells-centre-1037672.html" target="_blank">Think over and fall in line to restore old NEET SS pattern, SC tells Centre</a></strong></p>.<p>As Nataraj contended implementing reservations was a matter of policy, the bench asked, "What exercise did you do for reaching Rs 8 lakh figure or did you just list what is applicable to OBC?"</p>.<p>The bench pointed out as Indra Sawhney (Mandal case) judgment, those who are below Rs 8 lakh income, they filled the criteria of educationally and socially backwardness and economic backwardness.</p>.<p>"Here we are dealing with pure economic backwardness. We have to know what exercise has the Centre done. The notification specifically adverts to Rs 8 lakh. Now you have an Office Memorandum of January 17 which combines Rs 8 lakh with assets. Are you applying the asset cum income requirement?" the bench asked him.</p>.<p>"You just can't say it is a matter of policy when we are asking what is the basis of Rs 8 lakh for EWS eligibility," the bench asked Nataraj who sought time to file an affidavit in this regard.</p>.<p>Even though Nataraj maintained there was deliberation and with proper notings approved by the Cabinet, the court asked him to demonstrate the data or and contemporaneous study undertaken for it.</p>.<p>The court put the matter for consideration on October 20.</p>.<p><strong>Check out latest videos from <i data-stringify-type="italic">DH</i>:</strong></p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the Centre to explain the reasons behind fixing Rs 8 annual income as a criterion for declaring the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) category for claiming reservation in All India Quota seats in NEET examinations. </p>.<p>"What exercise did you undertake for reaching Rs eight lakh figure or did you just list what was applicable to OBC," a bench presided over by Justice D Y Chandrachud asked Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj.</p>.<p>The bench said the income criterion cannot be uniformly applied across the country as a person living in big metropolitan cities like Mumbai and Bengaluru with the same annual earning can't be compared with those living in a remote village in Uttar Pradesh.</p>.<p>The top court put the questions while hearing a batch of petitions by Neil Aurelio Nunes and others challenging the Centre's notification of July 29 to implement OBC, EWS quota in NEET-All India Quota from the current academic session in Post Graduate courses in medical colleges across the country. </p>.<p>As many as 15% seats in MBBS and 50% seats in MS and MD courses in medical colleges are filled through all India quota from the candidates selected on the National Eligibility cum Entrance Test.</p>.<p><strong>Also read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/think-over-and-fall-in-line-to-restore-old-neet-ss-pattern-sc-tells-centre-1037672.html" target="_blank">Think over and fall in line to restore old NEET SS pattern, SC tells Centre</a></strong></p>.<p>As Nataraj contended implementing reservations was a matter of policy, the bench asked, "What exercise did you do for reaching Rs 8 lakh figure or did you just list what is applicable to OBC?"</p>.<p>The bench pointed out as Indra Sawhney (Mandal case) judgment, those who are below Rs 8 lakh income, they filled the criteria of educationally and socially backwardness and economic backwardness.</p>.<p>"Here we are dealing with pure economic backwardness. We have to know what exercise has the Centre done. The notification specifically adverts to Rs 8 lakh. Now you have an Office Memorandum of January 17 which combines Rs 8 lakh with assets. Are you applying the asset cum income requirement?" the bench asked him.</p>.<p>"You just can't say it is a matter of policy when we are asking what is the basis of Rs 8 lakh for EWS eligibility," the bench asked Nataraj who sought time to file an affidavit in this regard.</p>.<p>Even though Nataraj maintained there was deliberation and with proper notings approved by the Cabinet, the court asked him to demonstrate the data or and contemporaneous study undertaken for it.</p>.<p>The court put the matter for consideration on October 20.</p>.<p><strong>Check out latest videos from <i data-stringify-type="italic">DH</i>:</strong></p>