<p>New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday (June 6) refused to accord urgent hearing on a plea challenging the Bombay High Court order which permitted <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/maharashtra/despite-dgca-advisory-inaction-on-illegal-slaughter-shops-near-nmia-raises-concern-3571309">animal slaughter</a> for Eid-ul-Azha and Urs at a 'dargah' at Vishalgad fort in Maharashtra's Kolhapur district.</p>.<p>The fort is a protected monument, citing which the authorities had prohibited slaughtering of animals and birds on the premises.</p>.<p>The plea challenging the high court's June 3 order was mentioned for urgent listing before a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma.</p>.Bombay HC permits animal slaughter for Bakri Eid and Urs at Vishalgad fort dargah.<p>"Tomorrow, Bakri Eid is there and in a protected monument, Vishalgad, in Maharashtra, the high court has permitted slaughter," the counsel, who mentioned the matter, said.</p>.<p>He said the high court has allowed animal slaughter in the protected monument area also for Urs till June 12.</p>.<p>"In protected monuments, so many religious activities are going on," the bench observed.</p>.<p>The lawyer claimed there was a specific notification of the state of Maharashtra which said animals cannot be slaughtered in the protected area.</p>.Follow government guidelines for Eid sacrifice, don't share pics of slaughtered animals: Jamiat to Muslims.<p>He said last year, animal slaughter within enclosed premises was permitted by the high court.</p>.<p>The counsel said the high court has said in its order that restrictions which were there last year, would apply this year also.</p>.<p>"Be it of any religion or faith, in a protected monument, so many activities are going on," the bench observed.</p>.<p>"Let me tell you, sitting in Tripura (high court), I had banned animal slaughter there and then this court modified the order to say, in an enclosed place it would be carried out," Justice Karol said.</p>.<p>The counsel then urged the bench to list the matter for hearing next week.</p>.<p>"What is the urgency? The matter would be infructuous," the bench observed.</p>.<p>A vacation bench of the high court had heard an application by Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan Dargah Trust, seeking permission for slaughtering animals.</p>.<p>The high court had permitted animal slaughter for Eid-ul-Azha to be celebrated on June 7 and the four-day Urs (fair) to be held from June 8 to 12 at the 'dargah' at Vishalgad fort.</p>.<p>It had said the order shall extend not just to the 'dargah' trust but to other devotees too.</p>.<p>The high court had said similar permission was granted last year too.</p>.<p>It had added that conditions imposed last year like carrying out the animal slaughter only in private and enclosed space specifically at Gate No. 19, which is privately-owned by Mubarak Usman Mujawar, and not in public areas, shall apply this year too.</p>.<p>The Deputy Director of Archaeology had prohibited animal sacrifice at the fort, citing the Maharashtra Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act.</p>.<p>The trust argued that the sacrifice was an "age-old practice" conducted on private land 1.4 km away from the fort, and that the meat was distributed to pilgrims and villagers nearby. </p>
<p>New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday (June 6) refused to accord urgent hearing on a plea challenging the Bombay High Court order which permitted <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/maharashtra/despite-dgca-advisory-inaction-on-illegal-slaughter-shops-near-nmia-raises-concern-3571309">animal slaughter</a> for Eid-ul-Azha and Urs at a 'dargah' at Vishalgad fort in Maharashtra's Kolhapur district.</p>.<p>The fort is a protected monument, citing which the authorities had prohibited slaughtering of animals and birds on the premises.</p>.<p>The plea challenging the high court's June 3 order was mentioned for urgent listing before a bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Satish Chandra Sharma.</p>.Bombay HC permits animal slaughter for Bakri Eid and Urs at Vishalgad fort dargah.<p>"Tomorrow, Bakri Eid is there and in a protected monument, Vishalgad, in Maharashtra, the high court has permitted slaughter," the counsel, who mentioned the matter, said.</p>.<p>He said the high court has allowed animal slaughter in the protected monument area also for Urs till June 12.</p>.<p>"In protected monuments, so many religious activities are going on," the bench observed.</p>.<p>The lawyer claimed there was a specific notification of the state of Maharashtra which said animals cannot be slaughtered in the protected area.</p>.Follow government guidelines for Eid sacrifice, don't share pics of slaughtered animals: Jamiat to Muslims.<p>He said last year, animal slaughter within enclosed premises was permitted by the high court.</p>.<p>The counsel said the high court has said in its order that restrictions which were there last year, would apply this year also.</p>.<p>"Be it of any religion or faith, in a protected monument, so many activities are going on," the bench observed.</p>.<p>"Let me tell you, sitting in Tripura (high court), I had banned animal slaughter there and then this court modified the order to say, in an enclosed place it would be carried out," Justice Karol said.</p>.<p>The counsel then urged the bench to list the matter for hearing next week.</p>.<p>"What is the urgency? The matter would be infructuous," the bench observed.</p>.<p>A vacation bench of the high court had heard an application by Hazrat Peer Malik Rehan Dargah Trust, seeking permission for slaughtering animals.</p>.<p>The high court had permitted animal slaughter for Eid-ul-Azha to be celebrated on June 7 and the four-day Urs (fair) to be held from June 8 to 12 at the 'dargah' at Vishalgad fort.</p>.<p>It had said the order shall extend not just to the 'dargah' trust but to other devotees too.</p>.<p>The high court had said similar permission was granted last year too.</p>.<p>It had added that conditions imposed last year like carrying out the animal slaughter only in private and enclosed space specifically at Gate No. 19, which is privately-owned by Mubarak Usman Mujawar, and not in public areas, shall apply this year too.</p>.<p>The Deputy Director of Archaeology had prohibited animal sacrifice at the fort, citing the Maharashtra Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act.</p>.<p>The trust argued that the sacrifice was an "age-old practice" conducted on private land 1.4 km away from the fort, and that the meat was distributed to pilgrims and villagers nearby. </p>