TN govt moves SC accusing Centre of withholding funds under Samagra Shikhsa Scheme over non-implementation of NEP

New Delhi: Tamil Nadu has filed a suit in the Supreme Court accusing the Centre of withholding funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme (SSS) over the non-implementation of the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 and PM SHRI Schools Scheme.

In its original suit filed under Article 131 of the Constitution, the DMK government sought a direction to the Union government to pay it Rs 2,291.30 crore, with interest at 6 per cent per annum on the principal sum of Rs 2,151.59 crore, from May 1, 2025, until the realisation of the decree.

The suit settled by senior advocate P Wilson contended that the glaring reason for such non-disbursement is that the Centre has linked the release of SSS funds with the implementation of NEP and NEP exemplary PM SHRI Schools Scheme despite these policy/schemes being separate ones.

"The Centre by withholding the plaintiff's entitlement to receive funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme is an ignorance of the doctrine of co-operative federalism. The usurpation of the constitutional power of the plaintiff State to legislate under Entry 25, List III seeks to coerce and force the plaintiff State to implement the NEP-2020 throughout the State in its entirety and to deviate from the education regime followed in the plaintiff State," the plea said.

The M K Stalin government also sought a declaration that the NEP 2020 and PM SHRI Schools Scheme as not binding on the State unless the state and the Union government entered into a written agreement to implement the same within the State.

"The Union government's actions in linking the Tamil Nadu States entitlement to receive funds under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme to the implementation of the National Education Policy 2020 and PM SHRI Schools within the State of Tamil Nadu as unconstitutional, illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable," the plea said.

It sought a direction that the letters of February 23, and March 07, 2024 issued by the Centre as illegal, null and void ab initio and not binding on the State.

The state government further sought a direction to the Centre to continue to comply with and perform its statutory obligations of paying to the plaintiff State grants in aid of revenues for implementation of obligations under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2010.

In its suit, the state sought for recovery of Rs 2291.30 crore within a time frame to be fixed by this court together with future interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the principal sum.