<p>Amid a raging controversy, the publishers of Tamil magazine <em>Thuglak</em> may reprint an article on a procession led by late Dravidian icon E V R Periyar in Salem in the coming issue which will be out next week.</p>.<p>“Many ask for reprinting of the 1971 <em>Thuglak </em>to bring out what <em>Thuglak </em>published about Salem. The entire edition need not be reprinted. We are thinking of printing the parts relevant to Salem in the coming <em>Thuglak </em>issue,” S Gurumurthy, editor of <em>Thuglak</em> magazine, wrote on Twitter. The next issue of the magazine will be out on January 27.</p>.<p><gwmw class="ginger-module-highlighter-mistake-anim ginger-module-highlighter-mistake-type-1" id="gwmw-15796934712401870388538">statement</gwmw> last week at the annual day celebrations of <em>Thuglak</em>, founded by late Cho, that the magazine was seized by the government after it reported about a rally headed by Periyar in 1971 during which “images of Lord Ram and Sita were taken nude" has created a major controversy in Tamil Nadu.</p>.<p>During his speech, Rajinikanth had said only the magazine had published news about the incident with a picture when no other news outlet bothered to report about it. As it brought a bad name to the DMK Government, Rajinikanth added, then Chief Minister M Karunanidhi had seized the copies, but Tughlak reprinted it and sold it in black. </p>.<p>speech triggered a major row in the state with the Dravidar Kazhagam, founded by Periyar, taking objection to the statement and demanded his apology. However, the actor has refused to .</p>.<p>The issue has been getting extensive media attention with <em>The Hindu</em> on Wednesday writing a detailed article based on the by its reporter on the ground who covered the 1971 incident. Now, <em>Tughlak</em> will reprint relevant portions in its next issue.</p>
<p>Amid a raging controversy, the publishers of Tamil magazine <em>Thuglak</em> may reprint an article on a procession led by late Dravidian icon E V R Periyar in Salem in the coming issue which will be out next week.</p>.<p>“Many ask for reprinting of the 1971 <em>Thuglak </em>to bring out what <em>Thuglak </em>published about Salem. The entire edition need not be reprinted. We are thinking of printing the parts relevant to Salem in the coming <em>Thuglak </em>issue,” S Gurumurthy, editor of <em>Thuglak</em> magazine, wrote on Twitter. The next issue of the magazine will be out on January 27.</p>.<p><gwmw class="ginger-module-highlighter-mistake-anim ginger-module-highlighter-mistake-type-1" id="gwmw-15796934712401870388538">statement</gwmw> last week at the annual day celebrations of <em>Thuglak</em>, founded by late Cho, that the magazine was seized by the government after it reported about a rally headed by Periyar in 1971 during which “images of Lord Ram and Sita were taken nude" has created a major controversy in Tamil Nadu.</p>.<p>During his speech, Rajinikanth had said only the magazine had published news about the incident with a picture when no other news outlet bothered to report about it. As it brought a bad name to the DMK Government, Rajinikanth added, then Chief Minister M Karunanidhi had seized the copies, but Tughlak reprinted it and sold it in black. </p>.<p>speech triggered a major row in the state with the Dravidar Kazhagam, founded by Periyar, taking objection to the statement and demanded his apology. However, the actor has refused to .</p>.<p>The issue has been getting extensive media attention with <em>The Hindu</em> on Wednesday writing a detailed article based on the by its reporter on the ground who covered the 1971 incident. Now, <em>Tughlak</em> will reprint relevant portions in its next issue.</p>