<p>US lawmakers vote Tuesday on a sweeping defence spending bill, the first of three huge measures Congress is scrambling to address this month, but it faces a potential veto from outgoing President Donald Trump.</p>.<p>The $740.5 billion bill's chief Republican sponsor, Representative Mac Thornberry, said strong support could provide a quick victory as Congress turns to approving a federal budget and a potential new relief package for the coronavirus-battered economy.</p>.<p>"The stronger the vote, the less chance of having to deal with a veto later," Thornberry, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, told reporters.</p>.<p>The committee's Democratic chairman Adam Smith was more forthright, saying that if the president vetoed the National defence Authorization Act (NDAA), lawmakers would "come back to vote to override it."</p>.<p>Both chambers are expected to pass the annual defence policy bill for 2021 this week, providing a three percent pay raise to military personnel.</p>.<p>In July, separate House and Senate versions passed by more than the two-thirds supermajority needed to override a presidential veto.</p>.<p>Trump has said he will withdraw his veto threat if lawmakers remove language on renaming military bases that honor Confederate commanders.</p>.<p>He is also demanding a provision to revoke a law, known as Section 230, that shields social media companies from liability over what users post on their platforms.</p>.<p>Thornberry said the defence bill should not be held up because of unrelated political disputes.</p>.<p>"Section 230 needs to be addressed, but in a different place and a different way," Thornberry said. "Airdropping it at the last minute is not the right thing."</p>.<p>Other Republicans have signaled they are prepared to reject the president's demands.</p>.<p>"My inclination would be to always vote for the troops and to vote for our national security," Republican Senator Bill Cassidy told Fox News Sunday.</p>.<p>Another potential sticking point: the NDAA opposes Trump's plan, announced in July, to reduce US troops in Germany.</p>.<p>It would bar the Pentagon from reducing its current level of 34,500 troops in Germany until 120 days after a defence secretary review of the action's implications is provided to Congress.</p>.<p>That would delay any troop withdrawal from Germany until after President-elect Joe Biden takes office, on January 20.</p>.<p>Reducing US troop numbers there "during a time of growing threats in Europe would constitute a grave strategic mistake that would undermine United States national security interests and weaken NATO," the bill states.</p>.<p>Meanwhile time is running out to avoid a government shutdown.</p>.<p>Federal funding expires on December 11 and Congress could decide to pass a one-week stopgap to give itself time to reach agreement on the 2021 budget before the Christmas holiday.</p>.<p>Talks are also ongoing on a compromise, $908 billion package that would offer relief for businesses and unemployed workers hard hit by the pandemic. But hurdles remain and success before year's end is not certain.</p>
<p>US lawmakers vote Tuesday on a sweeping defence spending bill, the first of three huge measures Congress is scrambling to address this month, but it faces a potential veto from outgoing President Donald Trump.</p>.<p>The $740.5 billion bill's chief Republican sponsor, Representative Mac Thornberry, said strong support could provide a quick victory as Congress turns to approving a federal budget and a potential new relief package for the coronavirus-battered economy.</p>.<p>"The stronger the vote, the less chance of having to deal with a veto later," Thornberry, the top Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, told reporters.</p>.<p>The committee's Democratic chairman Adam Smith was more forthright, saying that if the president vetoed the National defence Authorization Act (NDAA), lawmakers would "come back to vote to override it."</p>.<p>Both chambers are expected to pass the annual defence policy bill for 2021 this week, providing a three percent pay raise to military personnel.</p>.<p>In July, separate House and Senate versions passed by more than the two-thirds supermajority needed to override a presidential veto.</p>.<p>Trump has said he will withdraw his veto threat if lawmakers remove language on renaming military bases that honor Confederate commanders.</p>.<p>He is also demanding a provision to revoke a law, known as Section 230, that shields social media companies from liability over what users post on their platforms.</p>.<p>Thornberry said the defence bill should not be held up because of unrelated political disputes.</p>.<p>"Section 230 needs to be addressed, but in a different place and a different way," Thornberry said. "Airdropping it at the last minute is not the right thing."</p>.<p>Other Republicans have signaled they are prepared to reject the president's demands.</p>.<p>"My inclination would be to always vote for the troops and to vote for our national security," Republican Senator Bill Cassidy told Fox News Sunday.</p>.<p>Another potential sticking point: the NDAA opposes Trump's plan, announced in July, to reduce US troops in Germany.</p>.<p>It would bar the Pentagon from reducing its current level of 34,500 troops in Germany until 120 days after a defence secretary review of the action's implications is provided to Congress.</p>.<p>That would delay any troop withdrawal from Germany until after President-elect Joe Biden takes office, on January 20.</p>.<p>Reducing US troop numbers there "during a time of growing threats in Europe would constitute a grave strategic mistake that would undermine United States national security interests and weaken NATO," the bill states.</p>.<p>Meanwhile time is running out to avoid a government shutdown.</p>.<p>Federal funding expires on December 11 and Congress could decide to pass a one-week stopgap to give itself time to reach agreement on the 2021 budget before the Christmas holiday.</p>.<p>Talks are also ongoing on a compromise, $908 billion package that would offer relief for businesses and unemployed workers hard hit by the pandemic. But hurdles remain and success before year's end is not certain.</p>