<p>Unprecedented high drama was seen in the Supreme Court on Wednesday during the Ayodhya case hearing, when a senior advocate, representing Muslim sides, tore some papers inside the courtroom.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan created a flutter by his act of tearing map presented by senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha.</p>.<p>Singh, in his arguments, presented a book 'Ayodhya Revisited' by Kunal Kishore and map purportedly shown over there of the site.</p>.<p>This angered Dhavan, who tore it. He said the book can't be relied upon.</p>.<p>"This book was published in 1986. He cannot talk about it," Dhavan said.</p>.<p>The five-judge bench presided over by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, told him to shred it further.</p>.<p>The bench, however, did not fail to show its annoyance by saying, "if this continues, we will close the proceedings and walk out."</p>.<p>"As per us, the arguments are over. We can just get up and walk out," the bench said. </p>.<p>"With great respect, I have not disturbed the decorum of the court," Singh responded.</p>.<p>The court, earlier at the outset, said it would wrap up hearing, which entered its 40th day, on Wednesday.</p>.<p>"Enough is enough", the bench said, while rejecting a couple of intervention applications in the morning.</p>
<p>Unprecedented high drama was seen in the Supreme Court on Wednesday during the Ayodhya case hearing, when a senior advocate, representing Muslim sides, tore some papers inside the courtroom.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan created a flutter by his act of tearing map presented by senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha.</p>.<p>Singh, in his arguments, presented a book 'Ayodhya Revisited' by Kunal Kishore and map purportedly shown over there of the site.</p>.<p>This angered Dhavan, who tore it. He said the book can't be relied upon.</p>.<p>"This book was published in 1986. He cannot talk about it," Dhavan said.</p>.<p>The five-judge bench presided over by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi, told him to shred it further.</p>.<p>The bench, however, did not fail to show its annoyance by saying, "if this continues, we will close the proceedings and walk out."</p>.<p>"As per us, the arguments are over. We can just get up and walk out," the bench said. </p>.<p>"With great respect, I have not disturbed the decorum of the court," Singh responded.</p>.<p>The court, earlier at the outset, said it would wrap up hearing, which entered its 40th day, on Wednesday.</p>.<p>"Enough is enough", the bench said, while rejecting a couple of intervention applications in the morning.</p>
