‘Play a proactive role’, SC to Centre on Punjab-Haryana dispute on SYL canal

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked the central government to play a proactive role to find workable solutions between Punjab and Haryana in connection with Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal dispute.

A bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Aravind Kumar said the court expected the state governments would endeavour to sit together to find a solution for a way forward.

“We expect the endeavours of the states to sit together to still find a solution is the way forward and we call upon the states to hold meetings, not frequently at the highest political dispensation level so that at least there is some progress in the discussions. We expect the Union of India also to play a proactive role in the endeavour to bridge the gap,” the bench said.

Attorney General R Venkataramani submitted that the matter appears to be not really moving further despite the best endeavour of the Union government.

Also Read | ED tenure extension: SC rejects Centre's submission; says even those facing graft cases have right to be heard

Haryana government counsel disputed the position about possibilities of any settlement unless Punjab moves from its stated position.

He further flagged the issue that the reliance by the Punjab state on the Punjab Termination of Agreement Act (PTAA), 2004, stating that it is still in force is not sustainable in law as the reference was made which has been answered against the state of Punjab by this court.

“We only once again emphasise that any settlement requires parties to move from their stated position and there has to be a give and take. We are also clear in our view that whatever else may be the defence of the state of Punjab, no reliance is permissible on the 2004 Act once the reference is answered against it. We, however, record the submissions of the Punjab government counsel that this is an advisory opinion,” the bench said.

The top court fixed the matter for further hearing on October 4 and sought an affidavit from the Punjab government within two months.

The Centre earlier informed the court that the Punjab government has refused to construct the remaining portion of the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) Canal, saying it does not have additional river waters to share with Haryana.

The report, on the two meetings held between the chief ministers of the two states in October last year and January this year, said the Punjab government has stressed that there is no need to construct the SYL canal because the state cannot share any water.

The top court was informed that during the meeting, held in January, Punjab was of the view that the water availability in the Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej system of rivers has reduced and there is no excess water for sharing with Haryana, and the Punjab government also raised a contention on law-and-order.

The Centre contended that even after the best efforts by it, there has been no agreement on the issue of construction of SYL among the two states in the meeting and the Ministry of Jal Shakti is making all efforts to bring the states together for an amicable solution.