<p>The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Union government on a PIL, challenging the constitutional validity of Section 11 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.</p>.<p>The provision entrusted the Election Commission with the power to remove or reduce the period of disqualification of a legislator. </p>.<p>A bench of Chief Justice U U Lalit and Justice Bela M Trivedi agreed to examine the matter and sought a response from the Centre and others, after hearing retired IAS officer S N Shukla on behalf of his NGO 'Lok Prahari'.</p>.<p>In his submission, Shukla submitted that the provision should either be struck down or read down as it suffered from the vice of "excessive delegation".</p>.<p>During the hearing, the bench quizzed Shukla, "What is so bad about Section 11? Parliament itself felt that power could be delegated to the Election Commission."</p>.<p>Shukla, however, contended that the delegation of power amounted to excessive delegation.</p>.<p>On this, the bench sought a response from the Union government and put the matter for consideration on December 5.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice to the Union government on a PIL, challenging the constitutional validity of Section 11 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.</p>.<p>The provision entrusted the Election Commission with the power to remove or reduce the period of disqualification of a legislator. </p>.<p>A bench of Chief Justice U U Lalit and Justice Bela M Trivedi agreed to examine the matter and sought a response from the Centre and others, after hearing retired IAS officer S N Shukla on behalf of his NGO 'Lok Prahari'.</p>.<p>In his submission, Shukla submitted that the provision should either be struck down or read down as it suffered from the vice of "excessive delegation".</p>.<p>During the hearing, the bench quizzed Shukla, "What is so bad about Section 11? Parliament itself felt that power could be delegated to the Election Commission."</p>.<p>Shukla, however, contended that the delegation of power amounted to excessive delegation.</p>.<p>On this, the bench sought a response from the Union government and put the matter for consideration on December 5.</p>