<p> American legend Pete Sampras has lamented the lost art of serve and volley tennis and the one-dimensional nature of the modern game, which he likened to “throwing rocks” at each other.<br /><br /></p>.<p>The 14-time Grand Slam champion, who is in Melbourne to present the trophy to the men’s winner of Sunday’s Australian Open final, was the master of serve-volley, replete with a intuitive single-handed backhand.<br /><br />Sampras said tennis has changed substantially since he retired after winning the 2002 US Open.<br /><br />“The game certainly has changed in the last 10 years. The serve and volley tennis is a lost art. No one is really doing it,” he said.<br /><br />“Everyone is staying back and hitting the crap out of the ball, which is fun to watch.<br />“You look at Wimbledon these days. It is one dimensional. It’s just the nature of technology, maybe the nature of how everyone is growing up with technology.<br /><br />“They’re used to not having to volley, serve and volley. It takes time. It doesn’t happen overnight.”<br /><br />Sampras said in his era Stefan Edberg, Boris Becker and Goran Ivanisevic were great serve-vollyers along with him.<br /><br />“Now everyone plays the same way; there’s just four or five guys that are a lot better than the rest,” he said.<br /><br />“Roger Federer has a little more variety, to come in, slice it, chip and charge occasionally, show a little bit of that.<br /><br />“For the most part it’s just everyone staying back and throwing rocks.”<br /><br />Asked if he was still playing would he be serving and volleying, he said: “Yeah, why wouldn’t I? Serve and volley on both serves. That’s the only way I know how to play.<br /><br />“People say it’s harder to do it with the technology. But I think technology would have helped me out. If I used these racquets that Rafa Nadal is using, it’s easier to serve, easier to volley. I could serve harder, longer. It would have been easier. It all evens out. But I think serve and volley tennis it would have been just fine today. I just think you need to know how to do it.”</p>
<p> American legend Pete Sampras has lamented the lost art of serve and volley tennis and the one-dimensional nature of the modern game, which he likened to “throwing rocks” at each other.<br /><br /></p>.<p>The 14-time Grand Slam champion, who is in Melbourne to present the trophy to the men’s winner of Sunday’s Australian Open final, was the master of serve-volley, replete with a intuitive single-handed backhand.<br /><br />Sampras said tennis has changed substantially since he retired after winning the 2002 US Open.<br /><br />“The game certainly has changed in the last 10 years. The serve and volley tennis is a lost art. No one is really doing it,” he said.<br /><br />“Everyone is staying back and hitting the crap out of the ball, which is fun to watch.<br />“You look at Wimbledon these days. It is one dimensional. It’s just the nature of technology, maybe the nature of how everyone is growing up with technology.<br /><br />“They’re used to not having to volley, serve and volley. It takes time. It doesn’t happen overnight.”<br /><br />Sampras said in his era Stefan Edberg, Boris Becker and Goran Ivanisevic were great serve-vollyers along with him.<br /><br />“Now everyone plays the same way; there’s just four or five guys that are a lot better than the rest,” he said.<br /><br />“Roger Federer has a little more variety, to come in, slice it, chip and charge occasionally, show a little bit of that.<br /><br />“For the most part it’s just everyone staying back and throwing rocks.”<br /><br />Asked if he was still playing would he be serving and volleying, he said: “Yeah, why wouldn’t I? Serve and volley on both serves. That’s the only way I know how to play.<br /><br />“People say it’s harder to do it with the technology. But I think technology would have helped me out. If I used these racquets that Rafa Nadal is using, it’s easier to serve, easier to volley. I could serve harder, longer. It would have been easier. It all evens out. But I think serve and volley tennis it would have been just fine today. I just think you need to know how to do it.”</p>