<p class="title">The UN on Friday acknowledged Washington's decision to stop separating migrant families at the US-Mexico border but insisted that detaining children with their parents was not the solution.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Children should never be detained for reasons related to their or their parents' migration status," UN rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in Geneva.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"It is never in the best interest of the child for them to be detained," she said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Her comments came two days after US President Donald Trump, in a stunning about-face, ordered an end to his administration's widely criticised policy of separating families at the border.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Images and recordings of wailing children detained in cage-like enclosures have ignited global outrage, forcing the abrupt change of tactics.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Trump's executive order would keep families together but in custody indefinitely while the parents are prosecuted for entering the country illegally.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The president's order also suggests the government intends to hold families indefinitely by challenging a 1997 court ruling known as the Flores Settlement, which places a 20-day limit on how long children, alone or with their parents, can be detained.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Shamdasani slammed this solution, insisting that Washington "needs to explore non-custodial alternatives to detention, bearing in mind first and foremost the human rights of these migrants, in particular where families and children are involved."</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Irregular migration should not be a criminal offence. These people should not be treated as criminals," she said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The UN, she said, is calling for the "US to just overhaul its migration policies, urging the country to find "community-based alternatives to detention for children and families."</p>.<p class="bodytext">The UN children's agency UNICEF also vehemently opposes the policy, spokesman Christophe Boulierac told reporters.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We oppose two things: We oppose separating children from their families for the purposes of migration control but we also oppose to detentions," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He lamented that the United States was among some 100 countries around the world that detain children for the purpose of migration control.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We are working with governments to change that," he said, insisting that there are "alternatives which are working," including appointing community members who can guarantee that a child will show up in immigration court.</p>
<p class="title">The UN on Friday acknowledged Washington's decision to stop separating migrant families at the US-Mexico border but insisted that detaining children with their parents was not the solution.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Children should never be detained for reasons related to their or their parents' migration status," UN rights office spokeswoman Ravina Shamdasani told reporters in Geneva.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"It is never in the best interest of the child for them to be detained," she said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Her comments came two days after US President Donald Trump, in a stunning about-face, ordered an end to his administration's widely criticised policy of separating families at the border.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Images and recordings of wailing children detained in cage-like enclosures have ignited global outrage, forcing the abrupt change of tactics.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Trump's executive order would keep families together but in custody indefinitely while the parents are prosecuted for entering the country illegally.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The president's order also suggests the government intends to hold families indefinitely by challenging a 1997 court ruling known as the Flores Settlement, which places a 20-day limit on how long children, alone or with their parents, can be detained.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Shamdasani slammed this solution, insisting that Washington "needs to explore non-custodial alternatives to detention, bearing in mind first and foremost the human rights of these migrants, in particular where families and children are involved."</p>.<p class="bodytext">"Irregular migration should not be a criminal offence. These people should not be treated as criminals," she said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The UN, she said, is calling for the "US to just overhaul its migration policies, urging the country to find "community-based alternatives to detention for children and families."</p>.<p class="bodytext">The UN children's agency UNICEF also vehemently opposes the policy, spokesman Christophe Boulierac told reporters.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We oppose two things: We oppose separating children from their families for the purposes of migration control but we also oppose to detentions," he said.</p>.<p class="bodytext">He lamented that the United States was among some 100 countries around the world that detain children for the purpose of migration control.</p>.<p class="bodytext">"We are working with governments to change that," he said, insisting that there are "alternatives which are working," including appointing community members who can guarantee that a child will show up in immigration court.</p>