US cop acquitted in shooting death of unarmed black couple

Demonstrators face-off with police during a march as they protest against the acquittal of Michael Brelo, a patrolman charged in the shooting deaths of two unarmed suspects in Cleveland. Brelo was acquitted Saturday in a case involving a 137-shot barrage of gunfire that helped prompt the U.S. Department of Justice determine the city police department had a history of using excessive force and violating civil rights. AP photo

A white Cleveland police officer who climbed onto the hood of a car and fired several rounds at an unarmed black couple in 2012 was acquitted of voluntary manslaughter today.

The verdict comes amid widespread tensions in the US over police treatment of blacks, following the deaths of a number of African Americans at the hands of law enforcement.

Just a month ago, riots erupted in Baltimore over the death of 25-year-old Freddie Gray, who suffered a fatal spinal injury while in police custody. Six officers have been charged.

Cleveland patrolman Michael Brelo, 31, was one of 13 officers who opened fire on Timothy Russell and Malissa Williams during a police chase on November 29, 2012.

The couple's car had backfired as it drove past Cleveland police headquarters, and police thought the sound was a gunshot.

A total of 137 rounds were fired at the car, including 49 by Brelo. He shot the final 15 from the hood of Russell's Chevrolet Malibu.

Judge John O'Donnell found Brelo not guilty on the two charges of voluntary manslaughter and also acquitted him of felonious assault. Brelo had requested to have a judge hear his case, and not a jury.

O'Donnell said Brelo fired two shots that could have killed Williams and one shot that could have killed Russell, but the evidence did not meet the standard for voluntary manslaughter.

"Proof of voluntary manslaughter requires finding beyond a reasonable doubt," the judge said. Brelo broke down in tears after the verdict was read out.

Prosecutors had argued that Brelo's final 15 shots from the hood of the car were unjustified because the pair was no longer able to flee the scene and therefore no longer posed a danger.

But defence lawyers argued that Brelo reasonably feared for his life. Brelo's lawyer Pat D'Angelo hailed the verdict, saying his client had withstood "threats and intimidation" from prosecutors during the month-long trial.

"We stood tall, we stood firm. We didn't do anything illegal," D'Angelo said.

Deccan Herald is on WhatsApp Channels| Join now for Breaking News & Editor's Picks