More monitors at workplace give you bigger bragging rights

Workers in the digital era can feel at times as if they are playing a video game, battling the barrage of emails and instant messages, juggling documents, websites and online calendars.

To cope, people have become swift with the mouse, toggling among dozens of overlapping windows on a single monitor. But there is a growing new tactic for countering the data assault: the addition of a second computer screen. Or a third. This proliferation of displays is the latest workplace upgrade, and it is responsible for the new look at companies and home offices – they are starting to resemble mission control.

For multiscreen multitaskers, a single monitor can seem as outdated as dial-up Internet.

“You go back to one, and you feel slow,” said Jackie Cohen, 42, who uses three 17-inch monitors in her home office in San Francisco, where she edits a blog about Facebook. Her centre screen shows what she is writing or editing, along with email and instant messages; the left and right monitors display news sites, blogs and Twitter feeds, and she keeps three to 10 tabs open on each. One monitor recently broke, and she felt hamstrung. “I don’t want to miss seeing something,” Cohen said.

Her computer seemed to work a bit faster with one fewer monitor, she said. But her brain was a different matter. “I can handle it,” she added. “I’m sure there are people who can’t.” Certainly more people are trying. Tech firms sold 179 million monitors worldwide last year and only 130 million desktop computers – meaning “more screens per desk,” said Rhoda Alexander, who heads monitor and tablet research at IHS iSuppli. Monitors are bigger, too. The average monitor sold worldwide is 21 inches, up from 18 inches five years ago, according to iSuppli.

NEC Display, a major supplier of monitors, said 30 per cent to 40 per cent of the employees of its corporate customers now used more than one monitor, up from 1 per cent four years ago. There are many reasons for the spike in sales: monitors are much cheaper ($200 to $300 for a 24-inch display today compared with $700 five years ago); they are slimmer, too, so desks can accommodate more of them; and there are more communication tools – instant messaging, Twitter, Facebook – that workers have to keep an eye on (or at least feel they should).

More and bigger screens can convey bragging rights, too. Tech companies use them as recruiting tools, said Chuck Rossi, 45, who uses three monitors (27-inch, 30-inch and a 17-inch laptop) to toggle among dozens of tabs for his engineering job at Facebook, where he checks hundreds of software updates to the site each day before they become public. “Companies will pitch it” to job candidates, Rossi said. “They know real estate is important. It shows they are serious about their engineers.”

New job

And the engineers do care about the screens, he said, noting that someone might tell a friend about a new job by adding, “They’re giving me a 30 right off the bat,” which is shorthand for a 30-inch monitor.

The main rationale for a multimonitor setup is that it increases productivity. But that notion is not simple to prove or measure, partly because it depends on the kind of work people do and whether they really need to be constantly looking at multiple data streams. Another theory holds that people have just grown so addicted to juggling that having more monitors simply creates a compulsion to check them.

David E Meyer, a psychology professor at the University of Michigan whose research has found that multitasking can take a serious toll on productivity, said he buys the logic about toggling. But he also warned that productivity can suffer when people keep interrupting their thoughts by scanning multiple screens rather than focusing on one task.

“There is ‘thought-killing’ going on,” Meyer said. “Rome crashed and burned because it got too big. Go past that scale and you’re going to wind up like Rome.”

Matt Alfrey, 39, said he can handle not just two monitors, but six. He is a trader at Pacific Crest Securities in Portland, Ore., and his wall of monitors is a blur of messages, headlines, charts, graphs and stock tickers that he watches to help predict patterns in the market.

But there are downsides, Alfrey acknowledged, like the fact that even though he sits at a long table with other traders, he feels isolated by his monitors.

“You’re sitting behind a wall,” he said. On the other side of the table is a colleague who lives in Alfrey’s neighborhood and who is surrounded by monitors, too. “We joke that I’m more likely to see him in the neighborhood,” he said.

Ian Blaine, 42, chief executive of thePlatform, a video software company in Seattle, counts himself in the more-monitors-are-better camp. He uses two monitors himself and buys two for employees who want them. They tend to use one for programming and the other for communications, and Blaine said the extra monitor can save time on toggling.

“It’s probably milliseconds, but if you’re in the groove, it throws you off your game,” Blaine said, then added with a laugh, “Maybe I’m making that up and I’ve been duped into buying monitors because they want to look at the Internet while they’re doing work. But for now,” he said, “I’m buying it.”