How a DVD case killed a whale

Recently, biologists from the Virginia Aquarium and Marine Science  Center Stranding Response Team were notified of an unusual sighting in the Elizabeth river, a busy, industrial tributary of the Chesapeake Bay.

A 45-foot-long young female sei whale was spotted swimming up the river, far from the deep waters of the Atlantic where the species, listed as endangered, is normally found.

“She was in the wrong place at the wrong time,” says the aquarium’s research coordinator Susan Barco. The whale seemed disoriented. Susan and her
colleagues followed it for several days in an attempt to protect it from a fatal collision with a ship. Despite these efforts, the whale was found dead a few days later.

A necropsy revealed the animal had swallowed a shard of rigid, black plastic that lacerated its stomach, preventing it from feeding. The weakened whale also had been struck by a ship and suffered a fractured vertebrae. The shard that caused the whale’s demise was identified as a broken piece of DVD case. Most likely the marine mammal had swallowed the debris while feeding at the surface.

Plastic ingestion is a widespread problem for marine animals, particularly seabirds and turtles, which can easily confuse the debris for food. The indigestible material can obstruct the stomach or intestine, leading to starvation and death. As the amount of sea trash increases, so do the risks to marine life.

To compound the problem, scientists are still trying to fill in the blanks when it comes to the impact of marine debris on cetaceans. A 2014 study found that ingestion of debris has been documented in 56 per cent of cetacean species, with rates of ingestion as high as 31 per cent in some populations. “The whales that wash up on the beach are only a small percentage of those that die,” says Frances Gulland, a senior scientist with the Marine Mammal Center in Sausalito, California.

Sperm whales are particularly susceptible to plastic debris ingestion, she explains; they mistake debris for squid, their main prey. “Every sperm whale that I have necropsied has had a lot of nets and pieces of plastic in its stomach,” she says.

Frances encountered her most extreme case in 2008 – two male sperm whales stranded along the northern California coast, their stomachs full of pieces of fishing net, rope, and other plastic trash. One animal had a ruptured stomach. The other was emaciated, suggesting that it had been unable to eat. In both cases, the debris proved fatal. The variety and age of some of the plastic suggested it hadaccumulated over many years. According to Frances, who performed the necropsy, one of the whales had at least 400 pounds of debris in its stomach.

NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) Fisheries Southeast marine mammal stranding coordinator Blair Mase says the number of whales and dolphins impacted by floating marine debris seems to be on the rise. Though the statistical accounting can be tricky, Mase counts at least 35 strandings of bottlenose
dolphins in her region between 2002 and 2013 due to marine debris.

But surface debris is not the only culprit. Gray whales feed on the ocean bottom and inadvertently suction up marine debris along with small organisms like amphipods.

In 2010, John Calambokidis, a research biologist with Cascadia Research in Olympia, Washington, assisted in the examination of a dead gray whale that had stranded near Seattle. The debris found in the 37-foot male included more than 20 plastic bags, small towels, surgical gloves, a pair of sweatpants, duct tape and a golf ball. “It was,” John says, “a dramatic representation of the degree to which we impact the marine environment.”