A tiny house to call home

Some of them look straight out of sci-fi movies, designed somewhat like a spaceship, some like a designer camping tent, some like a boat upside down, some with interiors resembling a smartly done up budget hotel or cabin of a cruise vessel. But they are eye-catchers. On a rain-washed Edinburgh afternoon, people visiting the venues of the Edinburgh International Science Festival this April, were checking out these models in display at the city centre with great curiosity.

Urban populations are on the rise and the UN predicts that by 2060, about 66% of the world’s population will live in urban environments. A growing number of home developers are ‘thinking small’; challenging conventions and expectations as to what a home looks like, the size it is expected to be and looking to overcome obstacles through innovative architectural design.

In the year (2016) of Innovation, Architecture and Design in Scotland, the “Tiny Homes Village” is part of that campaign that had transformed the city centre into a platform for discussion of what turns a simple roof over our heads into somewhere we are happy to call home. From tiny homes to self-sustaining eco pods, traditional Mongolian yurts and emergency housing solutions, the models challenged Edinburgh’s city dwellers to consider how far – indeed how small – they would be prepared to go.

So what are some of the ideas behind these tiny homes? Dr Mike Page, director, Cube Project, which builds tiny homes they call QB1, QB2, QB3 (on display at the festival), says, “In all our buildings, we have aimed to show that even small houses can be fun and comfortable places to live, with very low demand on energy. We believe that many people who currently do not have access to housing (most notably in expensive cities like London) might deploy these efficient homes in small pieces of currently unused space.”

“With our first building, QB1, we wanted to show how one person, or two friendly people, could live a compact but modern life with a minimum impact on the environment. QB1 was only 3x3x3m internally, but took advantage of a number of low-energy technologies and techniques such that it generated as much energy, in an average year, as its occupants would use (even in the not so sunny UK; more so in India). So many people contacted us about QB1 that I designed, and we built, a production version, QB2. This was one metre bigger in one dimension, so 3mx4m in plan and 3m in height (all internal), but really did
provide a very comfortable level of accommodation for a couple,” he adds.

“QB3, our latest building, is the same internal volume as QB2, but is on one level, 3mx6m in plan, and 2m high. This makes it more appropriate for those with movement
difficulties. It makes the most of its floor area by having walls that move, allowing one to reconfigure the internal spaces to the tasks and activities required at a given time.”

Viability factor

According to him, it is feasible to have such homes in our urban areas in future. “Even expensive urban areas have underused spaces,  for instance, spaces on top of
other buildings, or on land waiting for later development. The practical problems (we need only an electricity supply, water, and drainage) are much less than the challenge of getting those who either own the land, or those who can grant residential permission, to be more imaginative regards what is possible,” he says. “If the exhibitions and festivals that we have attended are anything to go by, we have hundreds of potential customers, but only if we can get the land issue sorted. Maybe our initial client, therefore, could be a local authority with its own housing needs.”

QB2 has been lived in for a year now, in an urban setting, as part of a trial with a London Borough. “If we could provide land with planning permission, my view is that we would have many, many customers. However, the people that would be most interested  are the same people who do not have access to land. So there are issues other than just the design that will affect the uptake of our microhousing solutions,” he says. According to Mike in countries like India they can  be a solution to eco-friendly urban housing in future too. “India has more sunshine and, therefore, great potential for use of, say, solar energy. Our designs can be deployed under license in India using a local workforce and local materials. The Cube Project microhouses, QB2 and QB3, are very comfortable to live in, and are much less polluting than previous generations of housing.  The modern approach would match very well with the emerging image of India as a vibrant, hi-tech, and forward-looking country.”

Another version of upside down boat-shaped size tiny homes that grabbed attention at the festival is from a company called Armadilla, a family business based near Edinburgh. A total of 506 Armadillas have been already sold to date. Archie Hunter, managing director, and his son Ross, designer, built the first prototype in 2009 and have honed and perfected the design during the last 6 years.

“All Armadillas are designed to be constructed with 3 core principles in mind; durability, quality and longevity. Our unique steel base which is integrated into every Armadilla provides a rigid and perfectly level and square chassis to build from. Built from Grade A Siberian Larch and marine grade stainless steel fixings – every aspect of the armadillas design is to last and remain beautiful,” said the makers.