The KAT administrative member P S S Thomas and judicial member T N Manjuladevi have opined the amendment to the Constitution excluding the above from the status of family members is unconstitutional and invalid.
The petitioners - relatives of persons displaced for various government projects - had approached the Tribunal since they were not being considered as family members.
The provision for reservation is different from the one for appointment on compassionate grounds. The daughters-in-law and grandchildren too are like children. They have a right in son’s (husband) property. Excluding them from the definition of family members amounts to snatching their right, the Tribunal observed.
(Published 07 March 2010, 17:49 IST)