ADVERTISEMENT
Psychiatrists oppose SC verdict on homosexuality
PTI
Last Updated IST
A gay rights activist holds a rainbow flag during a protest against a verdict by the Supreme Court in New Delhi December 15, 2013. A gay rights activist takes a photograph of herself using her mobile phone during a protest against a verdict by the Supreme Court in New Delhi December 11, 2013. India's Supreme Court on Wednesday reinstated a ban on gay sex in the world's largest democracy, following a four-year period of decriminalisation that had helped bring homosexuality into the open in the socially conservative country. In 2009 the Delhi High Court ruled unconstitutional a section of the penal code dating back to 1860 that prohibits 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal' and lifted the ban for consenting adults. The Supreme Court threw out that decision, saying only parliament could change Section 377 of the penal code, widely interpreted to refer to homosexual sex. Violation of the law can be punished with up to 10 years in jail. REUTERS
A gay rights activist holds a rainbow flag during a protest against a verdict by the Supreme Court in New Delhi December 15, 2013. A gay rights activist takes a photograph of herself using her mobile phone during a protest against a verdict by the Supreme Court in New Delhi December 11, 2013. India's Supreme Court on Wednesday reinstated a ban on gay sex in the world's largest democracy, following a four-year period of decriminalisation that had helped bring homosexuality into the open in the socially conservative country. In 2009 the Delhi High Court ruled unconstitutional a section of the penal code dating back to 1860 that prohibits 'carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal' and lifted the ban for consenting adults. The Supreme Court threw out that decision, saying only parliament could change Section 377 of the penal code, widely interpreted to refer to homosexual sex. Violation of the law can be punished with up to 10 years in jail. REUTERS

The Supreme Court's recent verdict upholding Section 377 of the IPC has drawn flak from psychiatrists who said both heterosexual and homosexual behaviours are normal and natural aspects of human sexuality.

"Despite the social stereotype sentiments that portray lesbian, gay and bisexual people as disturbed, several decades of research and clinical experience have led all mainstream medical and mental health organisations to conclude that these orientations represent normal forms of human experience and bonding.

"That is why, mainstream organisations such as America Psychiatric Association long ago abandoned classifications of homosexuality as a mental disorder," Sunil Mittal, Director of CIMBS (Cosmos Institute of Mental Health and Behavioural Sciences) and Delhi Psychiatry Centre (DPC), said.

He said research has found no inherent association between homosexual orientations and psychopathology.

"The problem with Section 377 is one of definition. The phrase 'order of nature' has largely attained a traditional and patriarchal meaning as understood by the society. One of the arguments is that a human being's anatomy 'naturally' permits intercourse through means other than vaginal penetration and thus, those means could be interpreted as being 'the order of nature' too," he said.

Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. 

Deccan Herald is on WhatsApp Channels| Join now for Breaking News & Editor's Picks

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Read more
(Published 19 December 2013, 16:28 IST)