<p>The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), an apex body of the Muslims in the country, has decided to challenge the special CBI court's verdict <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/babri-masjid-case-verdict-after-28-years-all-32-accused-acquitted-demolition-in-ayodhya-not-pre-planned-895145.html" target="_blank">acquitting </a>all the 32 accused persons in the Babri Masjid demolition case.</p>.<p>The decision to challenge the verdict in the high court was taken at the two-day meeting of the AIMPLB's working committee, which concluded on Friday. </p>.<p>''The decision was unanimous,'' said a Board office-bearer here on Saturday. The meeting was held online owing to the coronavirus pandemic.</p>.<p><strong>Read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/in-perspective/the-babri-verdict-is-cause-for-worry-896678.html" target="_blank">The Babri verdict is cause for worry</a></strong></p>.<p>He said that the members expressed 'surprise' at the special CBI court's verdict and termed it 'unfortunate'.</p>.<p>''The members felt that there were ample grounds to challenge the verdict in the higher court,'' he added.</p>.<p>Earlier, Babri Masjid Action Committee (BMAC) convener Zafaryab Jilani had said here that he was not 'satisfied' with the verdict and that it would be challenged in the high court.</p>.<p>Jilani had said that the CBI had failed to put up a strong case despite there being enough evidence against the BJP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) leaders who had been charged with conspiracy to bring down the disputed structure.</p>.<p>The Board also decided to form a committee to apprise the political parties and religious outfits about the pitfalls of uniform civil code, sources said.</p>.<p>It also decided to intervene in the Sabarimala case as the members of the Board felt that it involved religious freedom guaranteed in the Indian constitution. </p>
<p>The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), an apex body of the Muslims in the country, has decided to challenge the special CBI court's verdict <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/babri-masjid-case-verdict-after-28-years-all-32-accused-acquitted-demolition-in-ayodhya-not-pre-planned-895145.html" target="_blank">acquitting </a>all the 32 accused persons in the Babri Masjid demolition case.</p>.<p>The decision to challenge the verdict in the high court was taken at the two-day meeting of the AIMPLB's working committee, which concluded on Friday. </p>.<p>''The decision was unanimous,'' said a Board office-bearer here on Saturday. The meeting was held online owing to the coronavirus pandemic.</p>.<p><strong>Read: <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/opinion/in-perspective/the-babri-verdict-is-cause-for-worry-896678.html" target="_blank">The Babri verdict is cause for worry</a></strong></p>.<p>He said that the members expressed 'surprise' at the special CBI court's verdict and termed it 'unfortunate'.</p>.<p>''The members felt that there were ample grounds to challenge the verdict in the higher court,'' he added.</p>.<p>Earlier, Babri Masjid Action Committee (BMAC) convener Zafaryab Jilani had said here that he was not 'satisfied' with the verdict and that it would be challenged in the high court.</p>.<p>Jilani had said that the CBI had failed to put up a strong case despite there being enough evidence against the BJP and Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) leaders who had been charged with conspiracy to bring down the disputed structure.</p>.<p>The Board also decided to form a committee to apprise the political parties and religious outfits about the pitfalls of uniform civil code, sources said.</p>.<p>It also decided to intervene in the Sabarimala case as the members of the Board felt that it involved religious freedom guaranteed in the Indian constitution. </p>
