<p>Bengaluru: The state government’s <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/bengaluru/bill-slashing-penalty-on-property-tax-in-bengaluru-by-50-passed-in-karnataka-assembly-2902869">decision to provide relief to property tax defaulters</a> in the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) jurisdiction has received a mixed response from citizens. </p>.<p>Many welcomed the move, stating that it could be an incentive for people and also help the government rake in revenue. </p>.<p>"It is the right step towards incentivising payments. While it will provide some relief to citizens, it will also help the government collect good revenue. We have seen the response to a 50 per cent discount on traffic fines when the government was able to collect a decent amount. Hopefully, this incentive will also garner a good response, too,” said Nitin Seshadri, a civic activist. </p>.<p>Echoing the opinion, Srinivas Alavilli, a civic activist, said it was crucial to introduce reforms that would enhance the collection of property tax. </p>.<p>"Property tax is the single biggest revenue source for the BBMP and any reform that simplifies the process and enhances collection is worth trying,” he said. </p>.<p>However, some citizens opined that the move might discourage innocent taxpayers who have paid the taxes diligently. </p>.BBMP budget to focus on digitising records .<p>"A taxpayer-friendly amendment is not one that removes penalties on defaulters. It is one that ensures that the BBMP follows a proper process ensuring that defaulters are penalised and innocent citizens are not harassed,” said Srikant Narasimhan from Bengaluru NavaNirmana Party (BNP). </p>.<p>He added that BBMP officials were harassing citizens by sending notices, citing wrong self-assessment and use of property for commercial purposes, and saving citizens from such harassment was a bigger concern now. </p>.<p>Seshadri, however, opined that the move would not discourage honest taxpayers since the rebate has been given only on the penalty and not on the principal tax amount. </p>
<p>Bengaluru: The state government’s <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/india/karnataka/bengaluru/bill-slashing-penalty-on-property-tax-in-bengaluru-by-50-passed-in-karnataka-assembly-2902869">decision to provide relief to property tax defaulters</a> in the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) jurisdiction has received a mixed response from citizens. </p>.<p>Many welcomed the move, stating that it could be an incentive for people and also help the government rake in revenue. </p>.<p>"It is the right step towards incentivising payments. While it will provide some relief to citizens, it will also help the government collect good revenue. We have seen the response to a 50 per cent discount on traffic fines when the government was able to collect a decent amount. Hopefully, this incentive will also garner a good response, too,” said Nitin Seshadri, a civic activist. </p>.<p>Echoing the opinion, Srinivas Alavilli, a civic activist, said it was crucial to introduce reforms that would enhance the collection of property tax. </p>.<p>"Property tax is the single biggest revenue source for the BBMP and any reform that simplifies the process and enhances collection is worth trying,” he said. </p>.<p>However, some citizens opined that the move might discourage innocent taxpayers who have paid the taxes diligently. </p>.BBMP budget to focus on digitising records .<p>"A taxpayer-friendly amendment is not one that removes penalties on defaulters. It is one that ensures that the BBMP follows a proper process ensuring that defaulters are penalised and innocent citizens are not harassed,” said Srikant Narasimhan from Bengaluru NavaNirmana Party (BNP). </p>.<p>He added that BBMP officials were harassing citizens by sending notices, citing wrong self-assessment and use of property for commercial purposes, and saving citizens from such harassment was a bigger concern now. </p>.<p>Seshadri, however, opined that the move would not discourage honest taxpayers since the rebate has been given only on the penalty and not on the principal tax amount. </p>