<p>New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to K Madal Virupakshappa, a BJP leader, on a plea by the Karnataka Lokayukta against a High Court order quashing the FIR lodged against him in a corruption case in March last year for the alleged payment of a bribe for the award of a tender, following which over Rs 6 crore in cash was recovered.</p><p>A bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sanjay Kumar also sought a response from the leader, then chairman of public sector Karnataka Soaps and Detergents Ltd (KSDL), on the interim plea to stay the HC's order.</p><p>Senior advocate Basava Prabhu Patil and advocate Chinmay Deshpande appeared for the Lokayukta and senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Sidharth Luthra represented Virupakshappa.</p><p>The Lokayukta challenged the validity of the High Court order of December 20, 2023, which quashed the FIR related to the alleged demand from complainant, a bribe towards the awarding of a tender, and the processing of bills.</p>.Supreme Court sets aside Karnataka High Court order on board exams for classes 5, 8 and 9 .<p>It was alleged that the main accused asked the complainant to approach his son regarding the bribe amount.</p><p>Further, during trap proceedings, Prashanth Madal, son of the then chairman, and his staff member Surendra were caught receiving bribes from the complainant, it contended.</p><p>It claimed Prashanth, who is not officially connected with KSDL and is an employee of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), negotiated and demanded bribes from the complainant. </p><p>The interference by the High Court in the present proceedings would only be tantamount to stifling of the proceedings, it contended.</p>
<p>New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to K Madal Virupakshappa, a BJP leader, on a plea by the Karnataka Lokayukta against a High Court order quashing the FIR lodged against him in a corruption case in March last year for the alleged payment of a bribe for the award of a tender, following which over Rs 6 crore in cash was recovered.</p><p>A bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Sanjay Kumar also sought a response from the leader, then chairman of public sector Karnataka Soaps and Detergents Ltd (KSDL), on the interim plea to stay the HC's order.</p><p>Senior advocate Basava Prabhu Patil and advocate Chinmay Deshpande appeared for the Lokayukta and senior advocates Kapil Sibal and Sidharth Luthra represented Virupakshappa.</p><p>The Lokayukta challenged the validity of the High Court order of December 20, 2023, which quashed the FIR related to the alleged demand from complainant, a bribe towards the awarding of a tender, and the processing of bills.</p>.Supreme Court sets aside Karnataka High Court order on board exams for classes 5, 8 and 9 .<p>It was alleged that the main accused asked the complainant to approach his son regarding the bribe amount.</p><p>Further, during trap proceedings, Prashanth Madal, son of the then chairman, and his staff member Surendra were caught receiving bribes from the complainant, it contended.</p><p>It claimed Prashanth, who is not officially connected with KSDL and is an employee of Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB), negotiated and demanded bribes from the complainant. </p><p>The interference by the High Court in the present proceedings would only be tantamount to stifling of the proceedings, it contended.</p>