×
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Centre cites scientific proof for refusing blood donation from trans, gay and sex workers

The government also said it is imperative that donors and recipients of blood donation have complete faith that the collected sample is safe and clinically effective
shish Tripathi
Last Updated : 11 March 2023, 14:33 IST
Last Updated : 11 March 2023, 14:33 IST
Last Updated : 11 March 2023, 14:33 IST
Last Updated : 11 March 2023, 14:33 IST

Follow Us :

Comments

The Union government has defended before the Supreme Court the 2017 guidelines that prohibited transgender persons, men having sex with men (MSM) and female sex workers from donating blood, saying those were based on scientific evidence, globally recognised by subject experts.

In an affidavit, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare said the blood transfusion system (BTS) in the country relied on blood donation and the guidelines have been put in place on account of the existing reality with regard to the quality of health system that varied throughout the country.

“It is important that every effort be made to strengthen the integrity of India’s BTS so as to instil confidence in people who have little option but to use the BTS in what may perhaps be the most difficult situation in their lives,” it said.

The government also said it is imperative that donors and recipients of blood donation have complete faith that the collected sample is safe and clinically effective.

The response was filed in a PIL by Manipur-based, Thangjam Santa Singh in which the court had on March 5, 2021 issued notice to the Centre.

The plea questioned validity of the Guidelines for Blood Donor Selection and Blood Donor Referral 2017 as it prohibited transgender persons, and men having sex with men and female sex workers from being donor. It contended that guidelines, which considered them as high-risk category for being HIV and AIDS infected, were violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution in view of being discriminatory on the basis of gender identity and sexual orientation.

The government, for its part, said it was imperative that both donor and recipient at opposite end have complete faith that the blood available in blood banks was not only safe but also clinically effective and of appropriate and consistent quality.

"Ensuring the safety and availability of blood was a major public health responsibility," the government said, adding the situation in developed countries was different as they deployed nucleic acid testing (NAT) which reduced the window period for transfusion-transmitted infections (TTIs).

In India, only a fraction of the 3,866 licensed blood banks deployed NAT technology. The NAT technology was very expensive, required trained manpower and specialised equipment which demanded proper handling and regular maintenance, it said.

The Ministry also maintained scientific evidence clearly showed that transgender persons, MSM and female sex workers are globally recognised as a population group with a higher prevalence of HIV and other TTIs, which has been the basis for subject experts to prescribe the exclusions.

ADVERTISEMENT
Published 11 March 2023, 14:33 IST

Deccan Herald is on WhatsApp Channels| Join now for Breaking News & Editor's Picks

Follow us on :

Follow Us

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT