<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday rectified an inadvertent error by which it had on Monday disposed of a plea on maintainability of a suit related to Gyanvapi mosque and Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi.</p>.<p>The top court had then put on hold until 5pm on July 26, a Varanasi district court's order allowing an extensive survey of the Gyanvapi Masjid by the Archaeological Survey of India to ascertain whether the mosque was built over a pre-existing Hindu temple. </p>.<p><strong>Also Read — <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/north-and-central/allahabad-hc-reserves-verdict-on-maintainability-of-gyanvapi-mosque-ownership-petition-1240493.html">Allahabad HC reserves verdict on maintainability of Gyanvapi Mosque ownership petition</a></strong></p>.<p>On Wednesday, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia of the Gyanvapi mosque, submitted before a bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud that the court had disposed of the main plea on Monday, instead of its interlocutory application seeking a stay on the ASI survey.</p>.<p>Ahmadi submitted before the bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, that there is a correction required in the Monday order and the court had accidentally disposed of the main special leave petition (SLP) and he had only moved an interlocutory application (IA).</p>.<p><strong>Also Read — <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/north-and-central/gyanvapi-mosque-survey-here-is-what-asi-is-looking-to-find-1240093.html">Gyanvapi mosque survey: Here is what ASI is looking to find</a></strong></p>.<p>Meanwhile, the Allahabad High Court resumed hearing on the mosque committee's plea against the ASI survey.</p>.<p>Ahmadi said the Allahabad High Court is hearing the matter and the SLP was against an Order 7 Rule 11 issue, which was not argued before the court on Monday.</p>.<p>He pointed out that it can be argued before the high court that their appeal has been dismissed.</p>.<p>Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Uttar Pradesh government and the ASI, submitted that he has no opposition to the revival of the mosque committee's petition.</p>.<p>The court rectified the order, clarifying that the disposed matter was, in fact, the IA and not the SLP as assumed earlier.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Wednesday rectified an inadvertent error by which it had on Monday disposed of a plea on maintainability of a suit related to Gyanvapi mosque and Kashi Vishwanath temple at Varanasi.</p>.<p>The top court had then put on hold until 5pm on July 26, a Varanasi district court's order allowing an extensive survey of the Gyanvapi Masjid by the Archaeological Survey of India to ascertain whether the mosque was built over a pre-existing Hindu temple. </p>.<p><strong>Also Read — <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/north-and-central/allahabad-hc-reserves-verdict-on-maintainability-of-gyanvapi-mosque-ownership-petition-1240493.html">Allahabad HC reserves verdict on maintainability of Gyanvapi Mosque ownership petition</a></strong></p>.<p>On Wednesday, senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing the Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia of the Gyanvapi mosque, submitted before a bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud that the court had disposed of the main plea on Monday, instead of its interlocutory application seeking a stay on the ASI survey.</p>.<p>Ahmadi submitted before the bench, also comprising Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra, that there is a correction required in the Monday order and the court had accidentally disposed of the main special leave petition (SLP) and he had only moved an interlocutory application (IA).</p>.<p><strong>Also Read — <a href="https://www.deccanherald.com/national/north-and-central/gyanvapi-mosque-survey-here-is-what-asi-is-looking-to-find-1240093.html">Gyanvapi mosque survey: Here is what ASI is looking to find</a></strong></p>.<p>Meanwhile, the Allahabad High Court resumed hearing on the mosque committee's plea against the ASI survey.</p>.<p>Ahmadi said the Allahabad High Court is hearing the matter and the SLP was against an Order 7 Rule 11 issue, which was not argued before the court on Monday.</p>.<p>He pointed out that it can be argued before the high court that their appeal has been dismissed.</p>.<p>Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Uttar Pradesh government and the ASI, submitted that he has no opposition to the revival of the mosque committee's petition.</p>.<p>The court rectified the order, clarifying that the disposed matter was, in fact, the IA and not the SLP as assumed earlier.</p>