<p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to interrogate TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee and his wife in Kolkata, instead of Delhi, in a case related to the West Bengal coal theft scam.</p>.<p>A three-judge bench, presided over by Justice U U Lalit, said the couple can be quizzed in Kolkata on a 24-hour notice.</p>.<p>The top court, however, took into record apprehension by Additional Solicitor General S V Raju against possible obstruction to the ED officers.</p>.<p>"We will not tolerate if any kind of infraction, interference, obstruction or hooliganism takes place," the bench, also comprising Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia, told the state government counsel.</p>.<p>The court also directed the state government not to take any coercive action against the interrogating officers in case a complaint is filed by anyone against them.</p>.<p>It also told the state government to provide adequate protection to the ED officers.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Kapil Sibal and Abhishek M Singhvi, appearing for the couple, challenged the Delhi High Court's order which dismissed their challenge to the ED's summons, for appearance in Delhi, issued in connection with a money laundering case linked to the West Bengal coal scam.</p>.<p>The law officer opposed the plea contending that the petitioners are potential accused in the case and should be allowed to be interrogated in Delhi. </p>.<p>The top court, however, passed the interim order in the matter and put it for further hearing, along with a similar plea by Nalini Chidambaram, on July 19.</p>
<p>The Supreme Court on Tuesday allowed the Enforcement Directorate (ED) to interrogate TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee and his wife in Kolkata, instead of Delhi, in a case related to the West Bengal coal theft scam.</p>.<p>A three-judge bench, presided over by Justice U U Lalit, said the couple can be quizzed in Kolkata on a 24-hour notice.</p>.<p>The top court, however, took into record apprehension by Additional Solicitor General S V Raju against possible obstruction to the ED officers.</p>.<p>"We will not tolerate if any kind of infraction, interference, obstruction or hooliganism takes place," the bench, also comprising Justices S Ravindra Bhat and Sudhanshu Dhulia, told the state government counsel.</p>.<p>The court also directed the state government not to take any coercive action against the interrogating officers in case a complaint is filed by anyone against them.</p>.<p>It also told the state government to provide adequate protection to the ED officers.</p>.<p>Senior advocate Kapil Sibal and Abhishek M Singhvi, appearing for the couple, challenged the Delhi High Court's order which dismissed their challenge to the ED's summons, for appearance in Delhi, issued in connection with a money laundering case linked to the West Bengal coal scam.</p>.<p>The law officer opposed the plea contending that the petitioners are potential accused in the case and should be allowed to be interrogated in Delhi. </p>.<p>The top court, however, passed the interim order in the matter and put it for further hearing, along with a similar plea by Nalini Chidambaram, on July 19.</p>