<p class="title">The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Karnataka government to file a detailed affidavit on the steps taken by it to remove spikes and fireballs which are used to drive away elephants, following a direction.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The apex court had a few weeks ago termed as "barbaric" the use of spikes and fireballs to drive away elephants and had directed the states to desist from using such methods.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court's directions had come after it was told that these methods were being allegedly adopted in states like Karnataka, West Bengal, Jharkhand and Odisha. It was hearing a petition which had raised the issue of tenders for procuring spikes and fireballs allegedly issued in these states.</p>.<p class="bodytext">On Monday, the Karnataka government told a bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur, S Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta that in July itself, the state authority had written letters to all concerned officers to remove these spikes and the process was continuing.</p>.<p class="bodytext">However, the counsel for the petitioner claimed that Karnataka has admitted in their affidavit that the spikes would take around six months to be removed.</p>.<p class="bodytext">At this, the bench said "six months is too long."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Karnataka's counsel referred to the affidavit filed by the state and said they have made a categorical statement that all the spikes would be removed.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The lawyer said that as far as time-frame of six months was concerned, she would take instructions and revert.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Additional Solicitor General (ASG) A N S Nadkarni, appearing for the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, told the bench that one of the officers of the state had given a statement that the spikes would not be removed till some other measures are put in place.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The petitioner's counsel also claimed that "nothing has moved on the ground" in the state despite the top court's order.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Karnataka's counsel told the court that no fresh tenders would be issued by the state for procuring spikes or fireballs meant to drive away elephants.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The counsel for West Bengal said the state has issued guidelines that none of these harmful things would be used to divert the elephants.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Similarly, Jharkhand government told the court that they have not put any restriction on the movement of wild elephants in the state.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench, while posting the matter for further hearing after three weeks, said that necessary affidavits, if any, be filed by these states.</p>.<p class="bodytext">It asked Karnataka to file a detailed affidavit indicating the steps taken by them with regard to removal of spikes in the state.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench noted that no lawyer appeared on behalf of Odisha in the matter. Later, a lawyer accepted the notice issued to Odisha government. </p>
<p class="title">The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Karnataka government to file a detailed affidavit on the steps taken by it to remove spikes and fireballs which are used to drive away elephants, following a direction.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The apex court had a few weeks ago termed as "barbaric" the use of spikes and fireballs to drive away elephants and had directed the states to desist from using such methods.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The court's directions had come after it was told that these methods were being allegedly adopted in states like Karnataka, West Bengal, Jharkhand and Odisha. It was hearing a petition which had raised the issue of tenders for procuring spikes and fireballs allegedly issued in these states.</p>.<p class="bodytext">On Monday, the Karnataka government told a bench comprising Justices Madan B Lokur, S Abdul Nazeer and Deepak Gupta that in July itself, the state authority had written letters to all concerned officers to remove these spikes and the process was continuing.</p>.<p class="bodytext">However, the counsel for the petitioner claimed that Karnataka has admitted in their affidavit that the spikes would take around six months to be removed.</p>.<p class="bodytext">At this, the bench said "six months is too long."</p>.<p class="bodytext">Karnataka's counsel referred to the affidavit filed by the state and said they have made a categorical statement that all the spikes would be removed.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The lawyer said that as far as time-frame of six months was concerned, she would take instructions and revert.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Additional Solicitor General (ASG) A N S Nadkarni, appearing for the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, told the bench that one of the officers of the state had given a statement that the spikes would not be removed till some other measures are put in place.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The petitioner's counsel also claimed that "nothing has moved on the ground" in the state despite the top court's order.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Karnataka's counsel told the court that no fresh tenders would be issued by the state for procuring spikes or fireballs meant to drive away elephants.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The counsel for West Bengal said the state has issued guidelines that none of these harmful things would be used to divert the elephants.</p>.<p class="bodytext">Similarly, Jharkhand government told the court that they have not put any restriction on the movement of wild elephants in the state.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench, while posting the matter for further hearing after three weeks, said that necessary affidavits, if any, be filed by these states.</p>.<p class="bodytext">It asked Karnataka to file a detailed affidavit indicating the steps taken by them with regard to removal of spikes in the state.</p>.<p class="bodytext">The bench noted that no lawyer appeared on behalf of Odisha in the matter. Later, a lawyer accepted the notice issued to Odisha government. </p>