<p>The news that China is considering a proposal to build a major hydro-electric dam over the Brahmaputra river (locally called Yarlung Tsangpo) in the Medog county of Tibet is a vital strategic move by Beijing in so far as its India policy is concerned. The proposed dam will be located about 30 km away from the Sino-Indian border at Arunachal Pradesh and very near the Great Bend of the Brahmaputra. </p>.<p>It is here that the mighty river, after originating from the Angsi Glaciar near Mount Kailash and traversing nearly 1,790 km in southern Tibet, enters India near Mount Namcha Barwa after a great U-turn. This is called the Great Bend of the river. Here, it experiences nearly a 2000-metre fall through the deepest canyon in the world.</p>.<p>Geographically, the dam, proposed to be twice as big as the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze river, will be something new and strategically it will be an important step forward in China’s continued efforts towards controlling the water resources of Tibet. China’s India policy is now being guided by two dominant considerations - safety and security of the road connecting Tibet with Xinjiang through Aksai Chin and keeping India under constant pressure in areas south of the McMahon Line by a spectre, real or unreal, of blockade of Brahmaputra water.</p>.<p>How many dams has China really built in Tibet on the Brahmaputra? There is a veil of secrecy. We know it for certain that Beijing has already commissioned a big hydropower dam at a place called Zangmu in the middle reaches of the Brahmaputra and three more are coming up at Dagu, Jiexu and Jiacha. </p>.<p> But Brahmaputra is a river system with many tributaries and perhaps some more dams are being built at different locations. Some recent media reports have quoted the number of such dams to be 11. However, some years ago, Jana Jagriti, an Assam-based NGO, pointed out that 35 dams are coming up on the Brahmaputra in Tibet - eight on the mainstream of the river and 27 more on the tributaries.</p>.<p>There are reasons for panic. China went ahead with conceptualisation and execution of the Zangmu dam since the second half of the first decade of this century. Beijing admitted it in 2010 after persistent queries from not just India but several other countries. Then a disaster happened on March 1,2012 when the river Siang (this is how the Brahmaputra is known in Arunachal Pradesh) had gone completely dry at a place called Pasighat where it used to be really voluble and wide. Although the river picked up momentum later on, yet it has not attained its former virility.</p>.<p>What may be the fallout of China’s design to construct dams on the Tibetan rivers, particularly the Brahmaputra? As a lower riparian country, India is hamstrung by the absence of any water-sharing treaty with China. Beijing is yet to open up its mouth in regard to the nature of the giant Medog hydro-electric project. But so far as the other dams on the Brahmaputra are concerned, its constant refrain is that these projects are run-of-the-river types and hence would in no way result in blockade of downstream waters. But an alarming portent lies elsewhere. After the Galwan incident in Ladakh, where both India and China lost some of their soldiers, Beijing has stopped sharing of river water data with India and New Delhi is not in the know of hydrological changes of the Brahmaputra in Tibet, if there is any.</p>.<p class="CrossHead"><strong>Worry remains</strong></p>.<p>But even if the hydro power projects are run-of-the-river, causes of worry remain for India as all the dams will be required to store huge amount of water and thus may deprive the north-eastern India of the nutrient rich silt of the Brahmaputra that makes the Assam plains so fertile. As all the dams mentioned above will be situated in close proximity to each other, free flow of the Brahmaputra water is sure to be disturbed. </p>.<p>As a result, Assam may get 64% less water during the monsoon season and 85% less water in the rest of the year. Moreover, these dams would give China another leverage. It can release less water during summer, if it wishes. Similarly, during the monsoon it can arbitrarily open up the gates of the dams thus inundating large parts of north-eastern India.</p>.<p>To call a spade a spade, Indian political leadership has been found to be unequal to fathom the massive danger that may lie ahead. Not only the proposed hydro power station near the Great Bend of the river but all the other dams on the Brahmaputra in Tibet are situated in areas near the geological faultlines where the Indian Plate collides with the Eurasian Plate. Therefore, these giant plants and their dams will have to live under constant threats of earthquakes. In such an event, large parts of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh will go under water.</p>.<p>Beijing has said that it will take into account the interests of the upstream and downstream countries while formulating the plans for the proposed power plant. However, both China and India should keep in mind the interests of the Brahmaputra river as well and prevent a rat race for control of the river water as India is also considering a proposal for construction of a 10 gigawatt hydropower plant in Arunachal Pradesh. </p>.<p>Moreover, there are earlier proposals for the construction of more such projects on the rivers Lohit and Subansiri, two tributaries of the mighty river. They will entail construction of big dams and displacement of large numbers of people. According to an Indian official, India is apprehending discharge of huge volumes of water from the Chinese dams in Tibet during monsoon.</p>.<p>But there is a third country – Bangladesh - whose fate is locked with the Brahmaputra. For the sake of ecology and humanity, Brahmaputra should have a free flow. It is hoped that good sense will prevail in Beijing and New Delhi.</p>.<p><em><span class="italic">(The writer is a senior journalist and commentator)</span></em></p>
<p>The news that China is considering a proposal to build a major hydro-electric dam over the Brahmaputra river (locally called Yarlung Tsangpo) in the Medog county of Tibet is a vital strategic move by Beijing in so far as its India policy is concerned. The proposed dam will be located about 30 km away from the Sino-Indian border at Arunachal Pradesh and very near the Great Bend of the Brahmaputra. </p>.<p>It is here that the mighty river, after originating from the Angsi Glaciar near Mount Kailash and traversing nearly 1,790 km in southern Tibet, enters India near Mount Namcha Barwa after a great U-turn. This is called the Great Bend of the river. Here, it experiences nearly a 2000-metre fall through the deepest canyon in the world.</p>.<p>Geographically, the dam, proposed to be twice as big as the Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze river, will be something new and strategically it will be an important step forward in China’s continued efforts towards controlling the water resources of Tibet. China’s India policy is now being guided by two dominant considerations - safety and security of the road connecting Tibet with Xinjiang through Aksai Chin and keeping India under constant pressure in areas south of the McMahon Line by a spectre, real or unreal, of blockade of Brahmaputra water.</p>.<p>How many dams has China really built in Tibet on the Brahmaputra? There is a veil of secrecy. We know it for certain that Beijing has already commissioned a big hydropower dam at a place called Zangmu in the middle reaches of the Brahmaputra and three more are coming up at Dagu, Jiexu and Jiacha. </p>.<p> But Brahmaputra is a river system with many tributaries and perhaps some more dams are being built at different locations. Some recent media reports have quoted the number of such dams to be 11. However, some years ago, Jana Jagriti, an Assam-based NGO, pointed out that 35 dams are coming up on the Brahmaputra in Tibet - eight on the mainstream of the river and 27 more on the tributaries.</p>.<p>There are reasons for panic. China went ahead with conceptualisation and execution of the Zangmu dam since the second half of the first decade of this century. Beijing admitted it in 2010 after persistent queries from not just India but several other countries. Then a disaster happened on March 1,2012 when the river Siang (this is how the Brahmaputra is known in Arunachal Pradesh) had gone completely dry at a place called Pasighat where it used to be really voluble and wide. Although the river picked up momentum later on, yet it has not attained its former virility.</p>.<p>What may be the fallout of China’s design to construct dams on the Tibetan rivers, particularly the Brahmaputra? As a lower riparian country, India is hamstrung by the absence of any water-sharing treaty with China. Beijing is yet to open up its mouth in regard to the nature of the giant Medog hydro-electric project. But so far as the other dams on the Brahmaputra are concerned, its constant refrain is that these projects are run-of-the-river types and hence would in no way result in blockade of downstream waters. But an alarming portent lies elsewhere. After the Galwan incident in Ladakh, where both India and China lost some of their soldiers, Beijing has stopped sharing of river water data with India and New Delhi is not in the know of hydrological changes of the Brahmaputra in Tibet, if there is any.</p>.<p class="CrossHead"><strong>Worry remains</strong></p>.<p>But even if the hydro power projects are run-of-the-river, causes of worry remain for India as all the dams will be required to store huge amount of water and thus may deprive the north-eastern India of the nutrient rich silt of the Brahmaputra that makes the Assam plains so fertile. As all the dams mentioned above will be situated in close proximity to each other, free flow of the Brahmaputra water is sure to be disturbed. </p>.<p>As a result, Assam may get 64% less water during the monsoon season and 85% less water in the rest of the year. Moreover, these dams would give China another leverage. It can release less water during summer, if it wishes. Similarly, during the monsoon it can arbitrarily open up the gates of the dams thus inundating large parts of north-eastern India.</p>.<p>To call a spade a spade, Indian political leadership has been found to be unequal to fathom the massive danger that may lie ahead. Not only the proposed hydro power station near the Great Bend of the river but all the other dams on the Brahmaputra in Tibet are situated in areas near the geological faultlines where the Indian Plate collides with the Eurasian Plate. Therefore, these giant plants and their dams will have to live under constant threats of earthquakes. In such an event, large parts of Assam and Arunachal Pradesh will go under water.</p>.<p>Beijing has said that it will take into account the interests of the upstream and downstream countries while formulating the plans for the proposed power plant. However, both China and India should keep in mind the interests of the Brahmaputra river as well and prevent a rat race for control of the river water as India is also considering a proposal for construction of a 10 gigawatt hydropower plant in Arunachal Pradesh. </p>.<p>Moreover, there are earlier proposals for the construction of more such projects on the rivers Lohit and Subansiri, two tributaries of the mighty river. They will entail construction of big dams and displacement of large numbers of people. According to an Indian official, India is apprehending discharge of huge volumes of water from the Chinese dams in Tibet during monsoon.</p>.<p>But there is a third country – Bangladesh - whose fate is locked with the Brahmaputra. For the sake of ecology and humanity, Brahmaputra should have a free flow. It is hoped that good sense will prevail in Beijing and New Delhi.</p>.<p><em><span class="italic">(The writer is a senior journalist and commentator)</span></em></p>