The court case that’s gripping Singapore

Immigration and the cost-of-living are key concerns for voters. The PAP had one of its worst-ever showings in 2020 — despite winning 61 per cent of the popular vote — due in part to concerns about the economy.

It’s a tricky balancing act for Wong, who just this week has been warning of the “dark clouds over the horizon” regarding the US-China contest for dominance in the Asia-Pacific. He’s leading a team of ministers who are vastly different from the ones who built the nation, bringing it, in the words of the late founding father, Lee Kuan Yew, from Third World to First. The current crop, or the 4G, as they are known, are viewed by a segment of Singaporeans as arrogant and out-of-touch. The fact that they earn million-dollar salaries, more than 10 times the average Singaporean’s wages, is also a sore point.

The government implemented private-sector standard salaries in 1994 to attract the best talent and prevent a culture of graft. But times have changed, Chong Ja Ian, an associate professor of political science at the National University of Singapore, notes. “These rules were established at a time when the PAP could legitimately say if we pay our ministers the highest salaries, they will be corruption free. With the wealth that is available in Singapore today, is this approach still feasible? Whether the PAP can come up with some alternative mechanisms remains untested.”

As the new leader, Wong has already clocked that there is an image problem, saying when Iswaran was first charged in January that maintaining clean government is non-negotiable. “This is part of our DNA,” he added. “There can be no compromise, no relaxation, no fudging of this, no matter the political price.”

There are things Wong can do to remind voters of the party’s principled history, and hark back to the can-do philosophy that helped build Singapore’s success. He has an opportunity for radical transparency, and could impose sweeping changes. One option is to mandate that MPs, elected officials and their families publicly disclose their assets. Currently, Singaporean political office holders only have to declare their income and assets to the prime minister. Wong could also argue that a parliamentarian or civil servant should not hold another job or directorship in the private sector, as some currently do.

The prime minister addressed this in a dialogue with students in July, saying the government recognized some MPs have “other private sector commitments” and that they were allowed to have full-time jobs, but that they were also fully expected to discharge their MP duties.

Divorcing public service from private sector pay could go a long way toward weeding out those not fully committed to their electorates. In the past, it was thought that if you want to attract the best talent to the ranks of Singapore’s elite, you need to pay them handsomely. But perhaps the new philosophy should be: If you don’t want to make some sacrifices to serve the people, then perhaps you’re not cut out for politics.