Trump rape trial: Lawyers clash over Jean Carroll's motives

Trump’s lawyer contended that her account was untrue and accused the writer of exploiting her story for personal gain

A lawyer for the writer E Jean Carroll told a Manhattan jury on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump viciously raped her client one evening nearly 30 years ago in a department store dressing room, an assault that she said Carroll, filled with fear and shame, long had kept secret.

“The whole attack lasted just a few minutes, but it would stay with her forever,” the lawyer, Shawn G Crowley, said in an opening statement in a trial in US District Court. She told the jury that the case is Carroll’s chance “to clear her name, to pursue justice and to get her life back.”

Trump’s lawyer, Joseph Tacopina, followed with an aggressive attack on Carroll, contending that her account was untrue and accusing her of exploiting her story for personal gain.

Also Read — Donald Trump: Art of the comeback or end of the road?

“She became a celebrity and loved every minute of it,” Tacopina said.

The lawyers’ unreconcilable characterisations came on the first day of the trial in the lawsuit by Carroll against Trump, brought under a new law in New York that allows sexual assault victims to sue the people they say abused them, even if the statute of limitations has long expired.

The trial, expected to last one to two weeks, seeks to apply the accountability of the #MeToo era to a dominating political figure. It takes place amid a barrage of legal action aimed at Trump, who is running to regain the presidency and arguing that lawsuits and investigations that he faces are meant to drag him down.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to New York fraud charges stemming from hush money paid to a porn star, and faces a civil fraud lawsuit brought by the state’s attorney general. He is the target of a criminal investigation in Georgia over attempted interference in the 2020 election. In addition, a federal special counsel is examining the discovery of sensitive documents at his residence, as well as his role in the events leading up to the January 6, 2021, assault on the Capitol. He has denied wrongdoing in all the cases.

Also Read — Stormy Daniels says Trump should not go to prison in hush money case

In Carroll’s case, her lawyers will ask the jury to find Trump liable for battery and defamation, and if he is found responsible, to award monetary damages.

Carroll, 79, a former magazine columnist, said nothing publicly about the encounter for decades before publishing a memoir in 2019 that accused Trump of attacking her.

In court on Tuesday, Crowley took the jury through a meticulous account of how Carroll’s chance encounter with Trump at Bergdorf Goodman in Manhattan began with humor and friendly teasing. She had met him once before and was leaving the store as he was arriving, and he asked her for help picking out a gift for a woman. She agreed, thinking it would make for a funny story, Crowley said.

They made their way up the escalator to the lingerie department on the sixth floor, which was unattended at that hour, Crowley said, adding that Trump eventually maneuvered Carroll into a dressing room and slammed her against a wall. “He pressed his lips against her,” Crowley said.

She said Trump then pulled down Carroll’s tights and sexually assaulted her. Carroll ultimately broke free and fled from the store.

Trump, 76, has denied that he raped Carroll, accusing her of lying and attacking her repeatedly in public statements and on social media, both while in office and after leaving.

In 2019, after she published her account, he called her allegation “totally false” and said he could not have raped her because she was not his “type”. Last October, he said again, in a post on Truth Social, that she was not telling the truth and that the case was a “complete con job.”

Carroll’s defamation claim is based on those October statements.

Crowley called Trump’s response to the allegations “swift and brutal.”

His lawyer, Tacopina, told the jury on Tuesday that Carroll was “advancing a false claim of rape for money, for political reasons and for status.”

Confronting the antipathy many feel for Trump, he added, “We all have to be treated the same way, even if you hate Donald Trump.”

In offering the jury a preview of Carroll’s case, Crowley described Carroll’s Midwestern upbringing, her dream of becoming a writer and her career as a successful columnist and magazine writer in the early 1990s.

Carroll will tell her story directly to the jury from the witness stand, Crowley said, and the jury will also hear from two friends in whom Carroll confided shortly after the events.

Anticipating a defense argument, Crowley said that it might be difficult to understand why her client would wait so long to reveal a sexual assault. But she reminded the jurors that the events took place nearly three decades ago, in a different world for single women, long before the #MeToo movement. She said the jury would hear from an expert witness who would testify that rape victims sometimes waited years or even decades to reveal what happened to them, or may never come forward at all.

Tacopina walked the jury through Carroll’s sexual assault allegation during his opening statement, casting doubt on nearly every detail.

Tacopina said certain elements of Carroll’s story were hard to fathom, such as that a “posh and upscale” luxury department store was nearly empty or that a sales attendant didn’t offer to help Trump, who was famous in New York at that time.

“It all comes down to do you believe the unbelievable?” he asked the jury.

As the judge, Lewis A Kaplan, took the bench on Tuesday morning, Carroll was seated alongside her lawyers; Trump was not present at the table where his lawyers sat.

Kaplan told the parties advise their clients and witnesses to “please refrain from making any statements that are likely to incite violence or civil unrest.”

“Both parties are well aware of the publicity this case has attracted,” the judge said. He said he was not suggesting either party or their attorneys had “engaged in any misconduct with respect to this trial.” But he made it clear that he was especially focused on the “safety and privacy of the jurors in the case.”

The nine jurors selected for the trial come from Manhattan, Westchester County and the Bronx and work in a variety of industries and jobs. One works for the New York Public Library, another for a hospital and a third as a building janitor.

The jurors will remain anonymous throughout the trial, a decision the judge made in a ruling last month, saying it was “all for your protection.”

“The fewer people who know who you are, the better,” Kaplan told them Tuesday.

After opening statements concluded late Tuesday, Kaplan released the jury, with testimony expected to begin Wednesday.

He then turned to Tacopina and asked if he was correct in assuming that Trump would not be testifying, as Tacopina had said the defense intended to play portions of the former president’s video deposition.

Tacopina responded, “I am not sure, your honor.”

The judge said he had to have an answer this week, adding that the uncertainty was an imposition on court security and staff.